Laserfiche WebLink
Site Evaluation <br /> Ranking Criteria <br /> 6/3/11 <br /> 6. Impact Trees,Species,Historic Resources <br /> a. The site will not likely require a significant tree mitigation/consideration <br /> b. The site will not likely require an environmental analysis related loss of suitable <br /> habitat for or the taking of sensitive species <br /> c. The site will not likely require an analysis related to impacts on historic <br /> resources <br /> 7. Potential Inconsistency with General Plan Themes <br /> a.Development of the site(assuming 3-4 stories)will not likely be inconsistent <br /> with the overarching goals/themes stated in the Introduction section of <br /> Pleasanton's General Plan:preserving and enhancing Pleasanton's character'and <br /> quality of life,and encouraging sustainable2 development (if potentially <br /> inconsistent score=0) <br /> 8. Site Size <br /> a. The site is 5 acres or more in size allowing for design flexibility <br /> b. The site is 1 acre or more in size allowing for more State/Federal financing <br /> opportunities <br /> 9. Interest in Site <br /> a. Property owner/developer has expressed interest in the site for high density <br /> residential development <br /> 10.Economic Interest <br /> a.Site is not adjacent to a freeway <br /> II.Criteria for Later Round of Evaluation <br /> 1. The project will create no significant environmental impacts or will create no <br /> significant environmental impacts which cannot be mitigated with reasonable <br /> mitigation measures <br /> 2. Will development of the site with housing be accepted by the surrounding <br /> community <br /> 3. Rezoning of the site will not have a significant fiscal impact on City <br /> 4. Project will not significantly contribute to an overconcentration of existing and <br /> potential high density housing into a few areas of Pleasanton <br /> Total"Yes"Responses <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> 4th Housing Element Cycle(2007-2014) <br /> Site Selection Criteria <br /> Page 2 <br />eight and Mass Compatibility <br /> a. Will the project(assuming 3 stories)be no more than one story higher than all <br /> adjacent residential development or all residential development across a <br /> residential collector or local street <br /> b. Will the FAR of the proposed project(assuming an FAR of 80%)be less than <br /> twice of the allowable FAR for development on all adjacent sites(not including <br /> parks)and sites across a residential collector or local street <br /> c.Site is not adjacent to or across(a residential collector or local street)from an <br /> existing single-family detached residential home(s) <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> 4th Housing Element Cycle(2007-2014) <br /> Site Selection Criteria <br /> Page 1 <br />ia for 6th Cycle (2023-2031) Housing Element Update Sites <br />ion review and provide a recommendation on the draft <br /> sites selection criteria for the 6th Cycle Housing Element, including any modifications, additions <br /> or deletions to the draft criteria as presented in Exhibit A. <br /> PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> Notice of this item was published in The Valley Times. This item was also identified in the <br /> Pleasanton Weekly's "Agenda Highlights" for upcoming public meetings, and an email <br /> Additional analysis in topic areas as views and aesthetics will be completed as part of the CEQA review, and will <br /> be brought forward for consideration in future evaluation phases. <br /> Housing Element Update Planning Commission <br /> 7 of 8 <br /> they reflect both the general planning principle that residential uses should be convenient to <br /> schools, parks, and other amenities, and also respond to criteria in the TCAC program that <br /> Housing Element Update Planning Commission <br /> 5 of 8 <br /> discussion regarding massage businesses that arose during the Downtown Specific Plan <br /> (DSP) update, and concerns then about an overabundance of personal services. She <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 9 July 28, 2021 <br />