My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 2217
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
2201 - 2300
>
ORD 2217
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2023 4:22:55 PM
Creation date
7/23/2021 10:05:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/20/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Tags
Ordinance
Description:
Ordinance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ordinance No.2217 <br /> Page 8 <br /> 3. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CHECKLIST: The applicant shall submit a "Conditions of <br /> Approval Checklist" indicating all conditions in Exhibit B have been satisfied, <br /> incorporated into the building permit plans or improvements plans, and/or addressed. <br /> Said checklist shall be incorporated as one of the first four plan sheets of all building <br /> permit and engineering permit plan submittals for review by the City prior to issuance of <br /> permits. <br /> 4. PUD PERIOD: Any building permit submittal will only be accepted after the ordinance <br /> approving the Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan becomes effective, <br /> unless the applicant submits a signed statement acknowledging the plan check fees may <br /> be forfeited in the event the ordinance is overturned. In no case will a building permit be <br /> issued prior to the PUD ordinance being in effect. <br /> 5. LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION: To the extent permitted by law, the project <br /> applicant shall hold harmless, defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), and <br /> indemnify the City, its City Council, its officers, commissions, employee and agents from <br /> and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the <br /> indemnified parties and/or the applicant to attack, set aside, or void the approval of the <br /> project or any permit authorized hereby for the project, including without limitation, <br /> reimbursing the City its attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. <br /> The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its <br /> choice. <br /> PLANNING DIVISION —925-931-5600 <br /> 6. MITIGATION MEASURES: All mitigation measures (16) listed within the Initial <br /> Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project by First Carbon Solutions <br /> dated April 5, 2021, and on file with the Planning Division are hereby incorporated as <br /> conditions of approval for the project and shall be adhered to and/or fully complied with <br /> to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. (Project Specific <br /> Condition) <br /> 7. PHASING — DESIGN/DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS: All structures/site improvements <br /> associated with future development phases on the subject site, specifically buildings 2 <br /> and/or 3 and the parking structure, but also including any ancillary structures and/or site <br /> improvements, shall be designed to be architecturally/thematically compatible/consistent <br /> with the Phase I structures and/or site improvements shown in the "Approved Plans" to <br /> the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. A separate Design Review <br /> application shall be required for each subsequent phase and shall be subject to Planning <br /> Commission consideration. (Project Specific Condition) <br /> 8. PHASING —STRUCTURE PLACEMENT: All structures/site improvements associated <br /> with future development phases on the subject site, specifically buildings 2 and/or 3 and <br /> the parking structure, but also including any ancillary structures, shall be set back a <br /> minimum of 32 feet from all property lines as shown on the "Approved Plans" However, <br /> as part of the subsequent design review process, the Planning Commission may require <br /> larger setbacks to be provided for some or all portions of buildings 2 and 3, to the extent <br /> necessary to maintain visual compatibility with the surrounding area, avoid over- <br /> concentrating building height and mass close to project frontages, and to provide for an <br /> attractive and varied building massing, articulation and streetscape, in a manner <br /> consistent with that achieved for Building 1. Minor changes to the structure placement <br /> determined appropriate by the Planning Commission during subsequent design review <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.