My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3_Exhibits A - C
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
07-28
>
3_Exhibits A - C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2021 6:38:35 PM
Creation date
7/20/2021 6:37:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/28/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
3
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\07-28
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Some Commissioners voiced concern that the policy was not well-articulated enough to <br /> provide clear guidance for decision-makers; and that the current policy language <br /> created too large of a loophole or had the potential for abuse_ As a result, the <br /> Commission suggested that the language in the policy be considered for revision. On <br /> March 2, 2021, the City Council requested a discussion of the active ground floor use <br /> policy be agendized during the "Matters Initiated" portion of the meeting. <br /> As discussed above, the existing policy requires that the first 25 percent of a tenant <br /> space, measured perpendicular to the façade fronting a designated active street, must <br /> be dedicated to an active use. The intent of the policy was to ensure that a business <br /> that might have a combination of uses: a) locate the active uses at the front of the <br /> tenant space, where they would be visible from the street and b) occupy a sufficient <br /> proportion of the space to represent more than a "token" amount. <br /> In its deliberations, the Commission questioned aspects such as whether a storefront <br /> display area (typically projecting into the tenant space) should be counted in the 25 <br /> percent measurement; whether the 25 percent requirement, in general, was sufficient; <br /> raised questions about ensuring the active portion of the business actually functioned as <br /> such, and would be maintained long-term; and other related aspects that typically <br /> denote active uses such as retail, such as hours of operation, business signage, having <br /> a point of sale (such as a cash register), and dedicated sales staff. <br /> Staff Response and Recommendation <br /> Staff finds that many of the points and concerns raised by the Commission with respect <br /> to this exception are valid and agrees that the existing policy needs to be made more <br /> stringent, to better meet the intent of the DSP, and avoid abuse. <br /> As such, staff believes it would be beneficial to amend the policy in a manner that would <br /> ensure that any non-active component in a multiple-use occupancy would be ancillary <br /> (clearly subordinate and secondary) to the active use. To accomplish this, staff would <br /> recommend two major changes: <br /> 1. That any non-active component (e.g. a subleased professional office space or <br /> personal service component within a retail store), be limited to occupy a more <br /> minor amount of the tenant space. Staff suggests the existing requirement be <br /> modified to require the active use to occupy at least 60 percent of the square <br /> footage of the tenant space, versus 25 percent as currently allowed; and <br /> 2. That such non-active component be situated in the rear of the tenant space or <br /> otherwise be located so as to not be prominent or visible from the street. <br /> The Commission discussed inclusion of more stringent operating requirements or <br /> performance criteria in the policy. However, staff would caution against attempting to <br /> dictate specific aspects of business operation such as opening hours, staffing, nature of <br /> merchandise sold, and content of business signage, since it is not typical for the City to <br /> do so for any business when a permitted use, and subject only to a zoning verification, <br /> 5 <br /> Exhibit B to July 28 Planning Commission agenda report <br />erty Phase II Specific Plan <br /> and approve a financing plan for the potential relocation of the existing civic center. <br /> 2 <br /> Exhibit B to July 28 Planning Commission agenda report <br />the Zoning Certificate that would allow the use to occupy the tenant space on June 7, 2021. <br /> Active Ground Floor Use Overlay Planning Commission <br /> 2 of 5 <br />