My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
072021
>
19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2021 12:53:12 PM
Creation date
7/15/2021 12:53:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/20/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
allowed, to minimize loss of parking on individual blocks. If a "private use" parklet <br /> program is explored, this may mean that some specific businesses wishing to have a <br /> parklet may not be able to, adding complexity to the program. This could be managed <br /> more equitably through a "public use" parklet program.2 <br /> Conclusion/Recommendation <br /> At this time, businesses have been interested in pursuing a parklet program with a <br /> similar structure to that which exists today with the pop-ups (i.e., each pop-up is <br /> exclusively used by one business). Based on the above concerns, staff does not <br /> recommend proceeding with a formal parklet program that would allow for individual <br /> businesses to install parklets for the exclusive, private use of their patrons. <br /> Staff recognizes the considerable hardship faced by restaurants, particularly during <br /> COVID. However, it will be challenging to structure a "private use" parklet program that <br /> will be equitable for all downtown businesses, and balance concerns about downtown <br /> parking. If the City Council has interest in continuing to explore a different form of <br /> parklet program, such as limited installation of "public use" parklets sponsored by <br /> businesses or the City, staff could bring back some more specific recommendations on <br /> the components of a program along these lines. These guidelines would include <br /> location standards, minimum design requirements, operational parameters, and other <br /> criteria for approval, as outlined above. <br /> Existing Policies <br /> Several existing policies support parklets (particularly publicly available parklets) <br /> downtown, including the following: <br /> • General Plan Community Character Element (Policy 4): Enhance the downtown <br /> as a focus of community activity. <br /> • Downtown Specific Plan (Land Use Objective 5): To encourage the creation of <br /> publicly accessible mini-plazas along Main Street. <br /> • Downtown Design Guidelines (p.26): Outdoor sitting and dining areas <br /> encouraged Downtown. <br /> • Downtown Design Guidelines (p.26): Maintain a minimum 4-foot passageway <br /> along sidewalks to preserve pedestrian flow. <br /> Several existing policies support maintaining the parking supply downtown, including <br /> the following: <br /> • Downtown Specific Plan (Mobility and Parking MP-G.4): ...Construct new public <br /> parking spaces as feasible to maintain an appropriate balance between <br /> downtown parking and supply. <br /> 2 The City is currently making improvements within the Transportation Corridor (mid-block between Abbie <br /> Street and Bernal Avenue), which will add approximately 80 new parking spaces within the downtown. <br /> While parklets will remove some parking spaces directly in front of downtown businesses, this additional <br /> vehicle parking supply could help to offset the loss of parking spaces. <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.