Laserfiche WebLink
ln response to Councilmember Balch's inquiries, Director of Finance Olson advised other than the <br />position mentioned earlier, the City has not budgeted for other positions or non-labor to help implement <br />Senate Bill (SB) 1383 in this budget. City Manager Fialho advised the City has $1 million set aside to <br />offset SB 1383 costs. He explained some of it was paid years ago by Pleasanton Garbage Service <br />(PGS) and earmarked for this implementation. He advised it has not yet been allocated and clarified the <br />$1 million he just mentioned is for start-up costs only and annual operating expenses could be covered <br />through rate adjustments because it is a new program. <br />ln response to Councilmember Balch's inquiries, Director of Finance Olson clarified the Low-lncome <br />Housing Fund is funded by developer fees in lieu of building 20o/o affordable housing. <br />ln response to Councilmember Balch's inquiries, Director of Finance Olson reported she does not <br />expect the per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) project to be fully installed in the next two years <br />which is why this budget does not denote operating costs. <br />ln response to Councilmember Narum's inquiries, Director of Operations and Water Utilities Yurchak <br />advised neither voluntary nor mandatory water conservation based on a potential drought were factored <br />into the estimates. She explained it is in part because the budget was completed before the State and <br />Zone 7 came out with conservation requests and noted staff will make any appropriate adjustments at <br />mid-year. She advised if conservation becomes mandatory. staff would come to City Council to discuss <br />potential drought rates. Director of Finance Olson clarified the increase in Zone 7 costs is partly <br />because the City will be putting wells out of service for PFAS and buying more water from Zone 7 . <br />ln response to Councilmember Testa's inquiries, Director of Finance Olson clarified the Rainy Day <br />Fund helps balance the budget. She noted it is an additional reserve not specific to pensions but to be <br />used for deficits the City will have to recover. City Manager Fialho clarified it is a 1O-year forecast <br />subject to revenue fluctuation and unknown future expenditures. Director of Finance Olson noted every <br />two years City Council can choose another means of balancing the budget. <br />ln response to Councilmember Testa's inquiries, Director of Finance Olson explained the City will debt <br />finance and possibly also grant finance the PFAS improvements along with rate increases. She advised <br />those details will be brought to City Council at a later date. She clarified she does not know how SB <br />1383 would specifically increase rates. <br />Councilmember Testa requested an itemized breakdown of how the federal recovery funds have been <br />and will be used for the follow-up discussion. Director of Finance Olson clarified there is nothing <br />budgeted in the future beyond the $8.5 million. <br />ln response to Councilmember Arkin's inquiries, Director of Finance Olson clarified the $400,000 in the <br />General Fund's contingency is for the PPD's new mental health-driven crisis response initiatives. She <br />advised allocations such as operational expenses, staff expenses, or contractual services will be <br />determined later. She confirmed it does not initially go to the PPD's operating budget. <br />Councilmember Arkin echoed Councilmember Testa's call for a breakdown of recovery fund usages for <br />both her knowledge and public transparency. Director of Finance Olson clarified the $8.5 million is <br />operating revenue which can be used for General Fund expenses. <br />ln response to Councilmember Testa's inquiries, Director of Finance Olson clarified the American <br />Rescue Plan allows a City to pay for General Fund expenses if it can demonstrate lost revenue greater <br />than or equal to the allocation. She advised the City has been allocated $8.5 million while the federal <br />methodology reflects $12 million in pandemic-related revenue losses. She explained this allows the City <br />to use it as a back-filling source for the entire General Fund. She further explained the $8.5 million is <br />based on the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) formula which looks at population <br />below-median income and the age of the housing stock. <br />City Council Minutes Page 8 of 10 June 1,2021