Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />DRAFT – June 15, 2021 | Page 23 <br />THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />SB 1383 ACTION PLAN <br />2021 ─ 2025 <br />3.2 Monitoring and Enforcement <br /> <br />(with the exception of generator violations of container contamination provisions, for which a penalty is <br />optional) (§18995.4; §18997.2). <br />• Conduct a sufficient number of route reviews, inspections, and compliance reviews to determine compliance, <br />and generate an electronic or written record for each inspection or review (§18995.1). <br />• Provide a procedure for the receipt and investigation of complaints, including the method for notifying the <br />complainant of the result of the complaint; investigate complaints received; and, maintain a record of all <br />complaints and responses (§18995.3). <br />• Pay penalties assessed by CalRecycle for the jurisdiction’s failure to comply, if any, which includes many <br />possible violations, ranging from minor, moderate, or major, and with associated penalties ranging from $500 <br />per violation to $10,000 per violation per day (§18997.3). <br />3.2.3 Ordinance and Policy Needs <br />The City will need to amend certain sections of the Municipal Code to integrate the enforcement processes and <br />penalties specified by SB 1383 for non-compliant generators, food recovery organizations, haulers, and other <br />entities. <br />3.2.4 Contract Implications <br />Delegating portions of the monitoring and enforcement programs will minimize the impacts on the City’s budget <br />and staffing requirements. While delegation to PGS is not recommended at this time, the City will need to ensure <br />that the amended Franchise Agreement provides for communication between PGS and the City’s inspection <br />process, particularly as it relates to logistics such as routing and scheduling for container inspections and providing <br />information the City will need to manage these monitoring and enforcement processes. <br />If the City opts to use a third-party contractor or consultant to perform monitoring and enforcement activities, it <br />will need to enter into a contract for these services. In addition to the inspection requirements, the contract will <br />need to include adequate record keeping and reporting provisions associated with the contamination reviews to <br />support the City in meeting SB 1383 reporting requirements and tracking program progress. <br />For contracts related to edible food recovery inspections, StopWaste will be entering into an MOU with the County <br />Environmental Health Department to confirm and outline requirements for the edible food recovery inspections. <br />3.2.5 Infrastructure Needs <br />To comply with SB 1383, the City will need to develop an information system for documenting and reporting <br />monitoring and enforcement efforts. The City can create an internal system and/or use a software platform to <br />support with record keeping and reporting related to monitoring and enforcement. The City currently uses Green <br />Halo for some solid waste program reporting, and PGS uses a system called Tower. Neither Green Halo nor Tower <br />are equipped for a full SB 1383 program. The City is discussing options with StopWaste, including evaluating the <br />regional use of web-based software platforms such as Recyclist. <br />It is recommended that the City use the software system selected by StopWaste, if in alignment with the City’s <br />specific needs... The City will have multiple entities involved in enforcement (e.g., City staff, StopWaste, County, <br />PGS, and/or third-party contractors), and a software system that supports the integration of records from multiple