Laserfiche WebLink
Green Building Measures <br /> The proposed home is more than 2,000-square-feet in size and, therefore, is required to <br /> comply with the City's Green Building Ordinance. As proposed, the project would exceed the <br /> minimum points required for new homes; 66 points proposed when a minimum of 50 is <br /> required by the PMC. <br /> Noise <br /> Noise levels with construction of one new single-family home will not change substantially from <br /> those currently experienced in the area, and would be required to conform with the City's noise <br /> ordinance. Ambient noise levels could decrease for some of the adjacent properties due to the <br /> shielding of traffic noise by the proposed fencing and building. Short-term construction noise <br /> would be generated during any new construction. In residential neighborhoods, the City allows <br /> construction hours from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Construction <br /> equipment would be required to meet DMV noise standards and be equipped with muffling <br /> devices. <br /> PROJECT SITE ALTERNATIVES <br /> As outlined in the above analysis, staff believes the projects density, development standards, <br /> architecture, site design, and landscaping, as proposed and conditioned, would be compatible <br /> with the other homes in the vicinity and not create adverse impacts, and recommends the <br /> Planning Commission recommend approval of the project to the City Council as proposed and <br /> conditioned. However, alternatives to the proposal that could be considered by the Planning <br /> Commission include: <br /> 1. Recommend denial of the project to the City Council; or <br /> 2. Recommend approval of the PUD development plan with modifications. The Planning <br /> Commission could recommend approval of the project with modifications to the <br /> development standards, architecture, landscaping, or other site improvement changes. <br /> Since staff believes the project will not adversely impact any properties or the surrounding <br /> area, and the project has been designed to be compatible with the existing homes in the <br /> neighborhood, staff recommends neither of the two project alternatives above be pursued. <br /> PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS <br /> The Pleasanton Municipal Code Section 18.68.110 sets forth the purposes of the Planned Unit <br /> Development District and considerations to be addressed in reviewing a PUD development <br /> plan. These purposes and considerations are set forth in the draft Resolution included as <br /> Exhibit A, and includes whether the plan is in conformance with the City General Plan, in the <br /> best interest of public health, safety, and general welfare, and whether the plan would be <br /> compatible with developed properties in the vicinity. As described in Exhibit A, and based on <br /> the information and analysis provided in this Agenda Report, staff recommends the <br /> Commission make the required findings to recommend approval of the project. <br /> PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a <br /> 1,000-foot radius of the site. At the time this report was published, staff had not received any <br /> public comments. <br /> PUD-140 & P21-0079, 2207 Martin Avenue Planning Commission <br /> 9 of 10 <br /> already in place and available in the area to <br /> offset the greater number of units. These facilities included the five-acre neighborhood <br /> park at the end of Martin Avenue and the 150-foot-wide buffer area located between <br /> Martin Avenue and the gravel quarry. Furthermore, the analysis concluded that <br /> PUD-140 & P21-0079, 2207 Martin Avenue Planning Commission <br /> 5 of 10 <br />g Commission Minutes Page 4 of 8 May 26, 2021 <br />k to that level of detail for the circulation, but <br /> staff would work with Simon Properties to ensure they were appropriately located in the <br /> design. Commissioner Pace asked if the driveway finalizations would come back before the <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8 May 26, 2021 <br />