Laserfiche WebLink
The proposed residence on Parcel A is set closer to the rear of the lot. The proposed siting <br /> allows for a large front setback and generous side and rear setbacks, which are consistent with <br /> the R-1-20,000 zoning District in Table 1. The large setbacks are also consistent with the <br /> existing residential streetscape and would substantially mitigate the mass and scale of the <br /> proposed residence when viewed from Dennis Drive. Extensive site improvements such as <br /> new driveway, walkways, porch, trellises, and front landscaping are proposed. The site <br /> improvements and proposed outdoor spaces relate well to the neighborhood and are sensitive <br /> to the site's natural features including the existing vegetation. <br /> As shown on the site plan in Exhibit B, the proposed house on Parcel A conforms to the <br /> development standards in Table 1. The existing home on Parcel B conforms to the <br /> recommended development standards; however, there are existing accessory structures on <br /> Parcel B which do not conform to the side yard setback requirements. Those accessory <br /> structures are considered legal non-conforming. Future development on parcel B would be <br /> required to adhere to the development standards established with the PUD. <br /> The Pleasanton Municipal Code does not address guest parking within single-family <br /> developments, but the City encourages, and often requires, on-site guest parking for single- <br /> family projects when there is not on-street parking provided within the project, as is the case <br /> here. The applicant is proposing a three-car garage and includes a generous driveway apron <br /> in front of the garage, 55 feet in length which can accommodate an additional two cars, to be <br /> used by the residents or guests of the home. Overall, staff finds the development standards for <br /> the project would complement the surrounding residential neighborhood. In addition, the site <br /> layout has been designed to be functional, e.g. providing sufficient maneuvering space for <br /> vehicles, and accommodating sufficient room for landscaping; and sensitive to adjacent <br /> residential properties. <br /> Building Design <br /> The proposed residence is a traditionally inspired design. The structure's design and styling <br /> include proportions, materials, detailing, and colors of high quality that are aesthetically <br /> pleasing, and are harmonious with and complement the character of the neighborhood. The <br /> applicant has provided relief to the massing through articulation, roof forms, and window <br /> treatments on all building elevations that are appropriate for the neighborhood and that provide <br /> sufficient visual interest from the street. The proposed colors complement the existing homes <br /> in the area and the mix of natural tones in the vicinity. As proposed, the two-story home would <br /> measure approximately 30-feet in height (measured from grade to the ridge) and would be <br /> generally compatible with the one- and two-story properties in the area. Overall, staff finds the <br /> architectural style of the building to be attractive and appropriate for the neighborhood. <br /> PUD-140 & P21-0079, 2207 Martin Avenue Planning Commission <br /> 7 of 10 <br /> 3. Parkland, open space, and trails were already in place and available in the area to <br /> offset the greater number of units. These facilities included the five-acre neighborhood <br /> park at the end of Martin Avenue and the 150-foot-wide buffer area located between <br /> Martin Avenue and the gravel quarry. Furthermore, the analysis concluded that <br /> PUD-140 & P21-0079, 2207 Martin Avenue Planning Commission <br /> 5 of 10 <br />g Commission Minutes Page 4 of 8 May 26, 2021 <br />k to that level of detail for the circulation, but <br /> staff would work with Simon Properties to ensure they were appropriately located in the <br /> design. Commissioner Pace asked if the driveway finalizations would come back before the <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8 May 26, 2021 <br />