Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton–10x Genomics Project Environmental Checklist and <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 75 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480024/ISMND/wp/21480024 10x Genomics Project Full Screencheck ISMND.docx <br />Environmental Issues <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />Impact with <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />2.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />Would the project: <br />a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either <br />directly or indirectly, that may have a significant <br />impact on the environment? <br /> <br />b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or <br />regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing <br />the emissions of greenhouse gases? <br /> <br /> <br />Environmental Evaluation <br />Setting <br />The State’s principal strategy and policies related to combatting climate change and reducing GHG <br />emissions are set forth in Executive Order S-03-05, Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), and the subsequent <br />Senate Bill 32 (SB 32). The legislative goal of AB 32 is to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by <br />2020. AB 32 required the ARB to develop a Scoping Plan that describes California's approach to <br />reduce GHG emissions to achieve the 2020 legislative reduction target. The most recent State <br />Scoping Plan, the 2017 Scoping Plan Update, reflects the 2030 legislative reduction target of a 40 <br />percent reduction below 1990 levels, as set by Executive Order B-30-15 and codified by SB 32. <br />Executive Order No. S-03-05 established a goal of reducing the State’s GHG emissions to 80 percent <br />below the 1990 level by the year 2050. However, the State Legislature and ARB have not codified this <br />goal and have not adopted a strategy or regulations designed to meet the 2050 goal. <br />This GHG emissions analysis is restricted to emissions of the GHGs identified by the State’s AB 32, <br />including CO2, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons (HFC), perfluorocarbons (PFC), and sulfur <br />hexafluoride (SF6). The proposed project would generate various GHG emissions during construction <br />and operation, including several defined by AB 32 including CO2, methane, nitrous oxide, and HFCs. <br />In addition, the proposed project would not involve industrial processes which could result in the <br />generation of HFCs, PFCs, or SF6 in substantial quantities. As such, CO2e emissions discussed below <br />are limited to a combination of emissions of CO2, methane, and nitrous oxide. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant <br />impact on the environment? <br />Less than significant impact. Both construction and operational activities have the potential to <br />generate GHG emissions. The proposed project would generate GHG emissions during temporary <br />(short-term) construction activities such as pavement removal site grading, operation of construction <br />equipment, operation of on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, hauling of materials to and from