My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN 05182021
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
CCMIN 05182021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 11:19:04 AM
Creation date
6/16/2021 11:18:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/18/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
standards as necessary to be more applicable to the new sites to be eventually identified through this <br /> process. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum's inquiry, Director Clark advised an analysis of best practices <br /> from other cities will be an important part of the process, relying on the expertise of LWC. She noted it <br /> is of particular importance for the development of affordable and workforce units. She advised they will <br /> be brought to City Council as the policy framework starts to come together. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum's inquiries, Director Clark advised one of the few benefits of <br /> having an allocation of over 5,000 units is relaxing the requirements from HCD for having affirmative <br /> property owner support under AB 1397. She explained the City will have a requirement to understand <br /> the willingness to develop to help make its case to HCD. Ms. Wise clarified the 5,000-unit threshold is a <br /> guideline for HCD and not a hard rule. She noted LWC is also working with the City of Long Beach <br /> which has a RHNA number of 26,000. She advised it is not practical to get this level of information for <br /> every property being considered for rezoning. She explained the City would handle the process the <br /> same as any rezoning, noting the City has a need and a right. She advised it becomes a planning <br /> exercise. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum's inquiries, Director Clark explained a developer trying to build a <br /> different type of unit than the site was slotted for in the Housing Element would not necessarily be the <br /> basis for a denial under SB 166. She advised it would be prudent to take a hard look at the project <br /> because it puts the City in a position of having to identify other sites to make up for the loss of expected <br /> units due to either affordability level or lack of density. Assistant City Manager Brian Dolan reported the <br /> City put in minimum density requirements for the last Housing Element and did not entertain anything <br /> below the minimum. He advised he has not heard anything which would prohibit the City from doing this <br /> again. He clarified there is a presumed income level at a certain density. He advised if the City allows <br /> something not income-restricted it has not met its obligation regardless of density. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum's inquiries, Director Clark advised the discussion on percentages <br /> for inclusionary housing will be an important part of the policy discussion starting this summer. She <br /> explained the City will need to have a robust discussion of policy strategies and could foresee potential <br /> changes to the Inclusionary Ordinance being part of the discussion. She advised this question has <br /> been raised by multiple Commission members. She confirmed amending it to allow for flexibility instead <br /> of a set percentage is also something to discuss. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch's inquiries, Director Clark confirmed staff recognizes they are <br /> transitioning from an all-virtual environment to either hybrid or in-person meetings based on whatever <br /> happens with the health orders. She advised they want as much engagement as possible through <br /> meetings, online surveys, etc. She noted integrating a residency requirement to any virtual meetings <br /> seems reasonable along with obtaining demographic information without being too invasive. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch's inquiry, Director Clark advised education is a huge part of the <br /> effort and noted there is a lot of misinformation and confusion about this complex topic. She advised <br /> staff already developed several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) posted on the new Housing <br /> Element website and will be updated throughout the process. She requested anyone who would like to <br /> add to the FAQ page reach out to Associate Planner Hagen. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch's inquiries, Director Clark explained the 250-acre figure is a <br /> preliminary estimate. She advised staff looked at a blended range of densities to arrive at 250 acres <br /> with less emphasis on lower-density development due to the low-income needs. She explained the <br /> need to be efficient with the available land is more pressing than ever due to the large number of units. <br /> She advised the expectation is to be looking at mid to high-density projects as the best way to get to <br /> the 6,000 figure and noted it is a work in progress. She confirmed SB 166 requires the City to account <br /> for both the total number of units and units by affordability. She advised the challenges presented by <br /> City Council Minutes Page 5 of 10 May 18.2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.