My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
061521
>
20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2021 4:22:50 PM
Creation date
6/9/2021 4:05:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/15/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
20 Attachment 1A
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\061521
20 Attachment 1B
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\061521
20 Attachment 1C
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\061521
20 Attachment 2A
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\061521
20 Attachment 2B
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\061521
20 Attachment 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\061521
20 Attachment 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\061521
20 Attachment 5
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\061521
20 Attachment 6
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\061521
20 Attachment 7
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\061521
20 Attachment 8
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\061521
20 Attachment 9
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\061521
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
drive, and appropriate to allow for the sort of flexibility that is the intent of the PUD zone. <br /> Factors in support of the slightly lower parking ratio include the proximity to the West <br /> Dublin/Pleasanton BART station and two bus stops, and the various measures the <br /> applicant will implement to promote alternative commutes (e.g., installing bicycle <br /> racks/storage, designating carpool spaces, providing incentive-based programs for <br /> employees, etc.). Further, to ensure parking is not an issue, a condition of approval is <br /> included, that if operation of the proposed use results in conflicts/complaints pertaining <br /> to parking and/or traffic/circulation, the applicant would be required to provide existing <br /> parking and employee counts to the City's Traffic Engineer for review. If necessary, the <br /> City's Traffic Engineer may require site and/or operational modifications to the use to <br /> mitigate any impacts. <br /> Noise <br /> The CEQA assessment included a noise evaluation, which concludes noise would be a <br /> less than significant issue. The assessment considered both external noise sources that <br /> could affect the subject site, as well as noise impacts generated by the project on <br /> existing adjacent uses. Additional information on the noise evaluation is provided in the <br /> Planning Commission Staff Report (Attachment 6) and Mitigated Negative Declaration <br /> (Attachment 1A). <br /> Architecture and Design <br /> Architecture, Colors and Materials <br /> Building architecture and design was among the more significant points of discussion by <br /> the Planning Commission, recognizing the proposed project, particularly at buildout, <br /> would be at a prominent location, and with larger and taller buildings that will appear <br /> substantially different from the low-rise structures that occupied the site for many years. <br /> The massing of Building 1 has been designed to incorporate changes in height between <br /> different portions of the building, shifting between two and three-story portions, and <br /> discrete and distinctive massing blocks, to add visual interest. A glass curtain wall entry <br /> feature with recessed entries, oriented towards Stoneridge Mall Road, and a large, <br /> transparent mass that would providing visibility into the building when viewed from the <br /> key approach along Stoneridge Drive, would add further articulation and interest to the <br /> building. The facades of the building use inset panels of varying depths and glazing in a <br /> rhythmic but differentiated pattern between building floors, to provide variety and <br /> differentiation across larger expanses of the building facades. <br /> Among its building materials, the project would make use of EIFS (Exterior Insulated <br /> Finishing System) panels; EIFS is an engineered cladding material comprising layers of <br /> insulating foam material, reinforcing mesh, and finish coatings that can emulate a wide <br /> range of building materials and finishes. EIFS is preferred in some projects because of <br /> its high insulative value, and a lower cost compared to more traditional exterior finishes. <br /> In response to questions raised by the Planning Commission about the potential <br /> durability of the EIFS materials, staff completed additional research and a site visit to a <br /> s Questions were raised, in part, because of damage that was seen to a sample of the material made available for <br /> review by the Planning Commission. In subsequent discussion with the applicant, it was noted the sample had been <br /> 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.