14 ATTACHMENT 1 EXHIBIT C - Laserfiche WebLink

Water Shortage Contingency Plan THE CITY OF rL£ASANTON® For each of the State's standard shortage levels (also called "stages"), Table 3 summarizes the water shortage range (i.e., percent shortage from normal supplies) and a brief narrative description of the corresponding water shortage condition. These water shortage stages apply to both foreseeable and unforeseeable water supply shortage conditions. The City's 2015 UWMP included four stages that addressed up to 50 percent water demand reduction. Table 3 presents the City's reorganized stages, which align with the State's standard stages. Table 3. Water Shortage Contingency Plan Levels (DWR Table 8-1) Adequate supply is currently available. To protect and 1 Up to 10% preserve water supply, the elimination of wasteful water uses is encouraged. There is sufficient uncertainty concerning water supply, either 2 Up to 20% based upon AWSDA findings or unforeseeable event, to lead to the conclusion that supply may not adequately meet normal demand in the current or upcoming years. Voluntary conservation; implement actions per Table 4 and ITable 5 Voluntary or mandatory conservation; implement actions per Table 4 and Table 5 Definable events, including but not limited to AWSDA findings, Mandatory 5 Up to 50% inadequate to meet customers' water demands; and/or lead to a reasonable conclusion that in the current and/or conservation; 3 Up to 30% upcoming water years, water supplies may not be adequate implement actions Definable events, including but not limited to AWSDA findings, to meet all customer water demands. Or, pervious water have severely compromised water supplies in the current conservation; conservation target has not been met, therefore further per Table 4 and reduction goal is not being meet, therefore further action is action is necessary. Table 5 Table 5 Definable events, including but not limited to AWSDA findings, Mandatory lead to a firm conclusion that in the current water year, water conservation; 4 Up to 40% supplies will not be adequate to meet customers' water implement actions demands; and/or previous water conservation target has not been met, therefore further action is necessary to reduce per Table 4 and water demand. Table 5 Definable events, including but not limited to AWSDA findings, Mandatory lead to a firm conclusion that water supplies are considerable conservation; 5 Up to 50% inadequate to meet customers' water demands; and/or implement actions pervious water conservation target has not been met, per Table 4 and therefore further action is necessary to reduce water demand. Table 5 Definable events, including but not limited to AWSDA findings, Mandatory have severely compromised water supplies in the current conservation; 6 >50% water year, and/or earlier stages have been in effect and the implement actions reduction goal is not being meet, therefore further action is per Table 4 and necessary to reduce water demand. Table 5 Notes: AWSDA = Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 6 City of Pleasanton Last Revised: 05-05-21