Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 6 <br />Water Supply Characterization <br />THE CITY OF <br />PL£ASANTON <br />augmentation") or directly into the water distribution system ("treated drinking water augmentation"). The <br />State is currently developing standard criteria for DPR. Specifically, AB 574 requires the SWRCB to adopt <br />uniform water recycling criteria for raw water augmentation on or before December 31, 2023. <br />In 2018, the Tri -Valley Water Agencies completed the Joint Tri -Valley Potable Reuse Technical Feasibility <br />Study' (Potable Reuse Study) with these goals: 1) to evaluate the feasibility of a wide range of potable <br />reuse options for the Tri -Valley based on technical, financial, and regulatory considerations, and 2) <br />assuming that potable reuse is found to be technically feasible, to recommend next steps for the agencies. <br />The Potable Reuse Study also refined cost estimates for potable reuse. <br />The Potable Reuse Study investigated three potential end uses for purified water in detail: 1) groundwater <br />augmentation or recharge via injection wells, 2) groundwater recharge via Chain of Lakes surficial <br />recharge, and 3) raw water augmentation to Zone 7's Del Valle Water Treatment Plant. Looking at annual <br />yields ranging from 5,500 to 10,000 AFY, the Potable Reuse Study concluded that potable reuse is <br />technically feasible for the Tri -Valley, with benefits to reliability and water quality. The lower yield would <br />use only Livermore wastewater supply with year-round operations, while the higher yield would be <br />achieved with seasonal availability of DSRSD wastewater supply. Water availability would increase over <br />time as development occurs in the Tri -Valley and more wastewater is generated and collected. In other <br />words, the maximum yield is expected to only be available after a certain point in the future; only a <br />fraction of the maximum yield is available before buildout. <br />In the 2019 WSE Update, raw water augmentation was modeled with the option for a two -phased project <br />that initially produces a lower yield but increases to the maximum yield in 2035 (following a growth in <br />available wastewater). Reflecting a more conservative estimate of future wastewater availability, the <br />2019 WSE Update used a reduced yield of 4,000 AFY starting in 2027 and 7,000 AFY after 2035. <br />Conservation regulations have set low indoor water use targets for California, which are expected to <br />reduce future wastewater flows. The estimates in the Potable Reuse Study had not incorporated the <br />recently set statewide indoor water use targets. Future analyses will adjust estimates as necessary based <br />on actual indoor water use trends and updated projections of wastewater availability for potable reuse. <br />Zone 7 is completing a number of technical studies over the next few years that will support continued <br />evaluation of potable reuse options and their costs and benefits. For planning purposes, the Zone 7's 2020 <br />UWMP assumes 5,000 AFY of future supply from BARDP (discussed in Section 6.2.8.1) and/or potable <br />reuse, with either or both systems online by 2030.10 <br />9Tri-Valley Agencies and Carollo Engineers, 2018. Joint Tri -Valley Potable Reuse Technical Feasibility Study, <br />htto://www.zone7water.com/library/reports-DlanninR-documents. <br />10 Pleasanton City Council voted not to participate in a regional potable reuse project at its February 21, 2021 City <br />Council Meeting. <br />WEST YOST <br />N-680-60-20-04-WP-R-680-2020UWMP <br />6-29 <br />City of Pleasanton <br />2020 Urban Water Management Plan <br />May 2021 <br />