Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. PC-2021-07 <br /> Page Four <br /> 6. Whether adequate public safety measures have been incorporated into the design <br /> of the plan: <br /> The public improvements associated with the Project would be consistent with City design <br /> standards. The existing driveway entrances are located and configured to provide <br /> adequate line-of-sight viewing distance and to facilitate efficient ingress/egress to and from <br /> the subject site. All on-site drive aisles would meet City standards for emergency vehicle <br /> access and turn-around. Adequate access would be provided to all structures for police, <br /> fire, and other emergency vehicles. Structures would be required to meet the requirements <br /> of the Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, other applicable City codes, and State of <br /> California energy and accessibility requirements. The buildings would be equipped with <br /> automatic fire suppression systems (sprinklers). Therefore, it is recommended the City <br /> Council make this finding. <br /> 7. Whether the plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District: <br /> The proposed PUD development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD district. One <br /> of these purposes is to ensure the desires of the developer and the community are <br /> understood and approved prior to commencement of construction. The proposed project <br /> implements the purposes of the PUD Ordinance in this case by providing an office and <br /> R&D project that is well-designed and well-integrated with the existing development in the <br /> vicinity, that fulfills the desires of the applicant, and that meets the City's General Plan <br /> goals and policies. By taking advantage of the flexibility of the PUD district, the applicant <br /> and staff have been able to work together to design the Project in a manner most <br /> appropriate for this use. Moreover, input from the adjacent property owners and tenants <br /> has been sought through a Planning Commission work session; further opportunity for <br /> public comment will occur at the Planning Commission and City Council hearings. Through <br /> the PUD process the Project has provided the developer and the City with a development <br /> plan that optimizes the use of this infill site in a sensitive manner. Therefore, it is <br /> recommended the City Council make this finding. <br /> Section 2: The Planning Commission hereby recommends the following to the City Council: <br /> a. Find that the proposed PUD Rezoning and Development Plan are consistent with the <br /> General Plan. <br /> b. Adopt an ordinance making the PUD findings contained herein and approve Cases PUD- <br /> 139 and P20-0973, subject to the draft conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B. <br /> Section 3: This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. <br /> on level areas of the subject site. <br /> The proposed structures would be compatible in size and scale with surrounding <br /> structures, and subsequent phases of the project would be subject to Planning Commission <br /> Design Review to ensure massing, scale and design of buildings is harmonious with the <br /> surrounding area. New landscaping including large box-sized trees would be installed to <br /> mitigate the loss of the existing landscaping and trees. Therefore, it is recommended the <br /> City Council make this finding. <br /><br /> uses to support Pleasanton's increasing business activity. It is recommended the City <br /> Council find the proposed development plan is consistent with the City's General Plan, and <br /> this finding can be made. <br /> November 18, 2020 <br />Approvals or that could prevent or <br /> 4412928_2 -10- <br /> the Project, which list shall include the following items: <br /> 4412928_2 -8- <br />