_Minutes_March 24, 2021 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chair Brown reiterated his suggestion for commercial ground floor along Lots 10 and 11 . He stated he was not opposed to residential in the rear although the DSP stated they should look to leverage the Arroyo in creative ways. He stated he was not prepared to discuss parking because there was not yet a compelling site layout that met the intent of the DSP or zoning. Discussion Point #3: Building Massing and Architecture A) Is the proposed two-story building massing and architectural design acceptable? Commissioner Allen reiterated the design for the residential community was beautiful and hoped to find that type of design in Pleasanton. She stated she would leave the architectural design for the new layout to the architect. She stated the minimum commercial space needed to go beyond the front facing buildings on St. John Street and should include the space currently occupied for public use, including Barone's Restaurant, the cabana, entertainment space under the 2009 CUP, and associated required parking. She stated it was necessary to retain the existing public use of retail even if not currently zoned as retail. Chair Brown asked for clarification on the term "public use." Commissioner Allen clarified the public was accessing the space for entertainment, restaurant usage and events by invitation of the owners. Commissioner Gaidos stated the designs were nice looking and he had no problem with the two-story aspects of the design. Commissioner O'Connor stated the design was fine as a residential development, but the commercial should be retained. He stated the new design with commercial would have to be reconsidered. Commissioner Pace discussed the adjacent properties and opportunities to develop up with a multi-use project. He stated the need for commercial use on the first floor, whether one large building or multiple smaller spaces with upward development as a potential solution. Chair Brown stated that Commissioner Allen covered the amount of commercial space aptly and he referenced Page 13 of the staff report. He expressed hesitation with ensuring the commercial space was sustainable. He mentioned the public comments regarding mixed vendor buildings allowing for a unique gathering space for commercial with a smaller footprint to promote lower costs and a more stable venue. He stated two story building massing was appropriate and three story could be fine since it was a transitional space. He stated he would hold judgment until he saw a plan that met the intent of the DSP and Council direction. Discussion Point #4: Other Information A) Is there additional information needed to assist the Commission in its decision on the proposal? Commissioner Pace asked if the applicant had asked if the City was interested in purchasing the space, or at least part of it for City purposes. Ms. Clark stated it was not a conversation that had been had with the applicant or property owner. Commissioner Allen requested a tree analysis and total square footage currently used for retail. Ms. Clark asked if she wanted to know the total size of the property, the building, plus all outdoor areas. Commissioner Allen clarified that she wanted the square footage on the Planning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 12 March 24, 2021