Laserfiche WebLink
BACKGROUND <br /> Campaign contribution limits have historically been permitted due to concerns that <br /> donors may gain unfair access to, or influence over, officials who are subsequently <br /> elected. Limits on contributions and expenditures also must be balanced with First <br /> Amendment considerations for freedom of speech and association. Campaign finance <br /> laws generally regulate campaign contributions by establishing limits, source <br /> restrictions, and disclosure requirements. <br /> In 1974, California voters adopted the Political Reform Act (Act) to regulate: campaign <br /> contributions and expenditures; lobbying; and conflicts of interest.' The Act also <br /> established the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC), which adopts <br /> regulations to implement and enforce the Act. These laws have evolved over time <br /> both by the state legislature and with California voters adopting: Props. 68 <br /> (contribution limits) and 73 (contribution limit and inter-candidate transfer ban) in 1988, <br /> Prop. 112 (gift and travel payment limits) in 1990; Prop. 208 in 1997 —then repealed <br /> by Prop. 34 (contribution limits, disclosure expansion, lobbyist contribution limits, and <br /> allowed independent expenditure committees) in 2000. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Contribution Limits. Most recently, the state legislature adopted AB 571 (2019 Mullin) — <br /> Political Reform Act and Local Contribution Limits - that caps a person's contributions to <br /> a candidate for county or city elective office at an adjusted amount established by the <br /> FPPC2. The FPPC says that for 2021-2022, the maximum amount for an individual <br /> contribution to a candidate for city or county office will be $4,900 per election. <br /> AB 571 allows a city to adopt its own contribution limits, including amounts higher or <br /> lower than the state's $4,900 cap per person. In reviewing campaign finance disclosure <br /> statements from the 2020 election, of the committees3 required to file pre-election <br /> disclosure statements the largest individual contributions did not exceed the $4,900 cap. <br /> Options. The Council may consider campaign contribution limits which are more <br /> or less restrictive than the state's $4,900 limit per contributor to a candidate for city <br /> office.4 <br /> As no candidate received a contribution which exceeded the state's $4,900 limit, <br /> it is not recommended that the Council consider a limit higher than AB 571. <br /> ' Under the Act, a conflict of interest is defined as a financial interest which, at set monetary thresholds, <br /> prohibits an elected or appointed official, or certain government employees, from making, participating, or <br /> influencing a decision in their official capacity. <br /> See Cal. Election Code§85301(d) and Cal. Govt. Code §83124. <br /> For candidates who do not plan to raise or spend $2,000 or more in a calendar year, including the <br /> candidate's personal funds, these disclosures are not required. <br /> 'Contribution limits by individuals to candidates have been upheld due to concerns about corruption. <br /> Courts have not allowed campaign contribution limits to committees supporting or opposing local ballot <br /> measures, finding no important governmental interest in regulating such contributions. <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />