My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN 01192021
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
CCMIN 01192021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2021 3:30:09 PM
Creation date
3/4/2021 3:28:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/19/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
not-for-profit agencies providing social services to Pleasanton residents, hospital workers, food service <br /> workers, State and federal government employees; reduce the bonus points for these groups from two <br /> to one; and apply these changes to the Below Market Rate Rental Assistance Program's preference <br /> program. Motion failed by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmember Arkin <br /> Noes: Councilmembers Balch, Narum, Testa, Mayor Brown <br /> Absent: None <br /> Councilmember Testa moved to not have any occupational preferences and stand by the priority point <br /> system which does not include occupations. The motion was not seconded. <br /> Councilmember Balch moved to approve staff recommendations with the addition of a six month <br /> minimum period of employment. He mentioned he would be amiable to a BMR amendment. <br /> In response to Councilmember Arkin's inquiry, Councilmember Balch stated he would be amiable to <br /> modifying the two bonus points to one. She stated she would like to see the BMR units included. <br /> Councilmember Balch expressed his interest in their inclusion so the priority programs are consistent. <br /> He restated his motion with the inclusion of BMR and awarding just one point. Councilmember Arkin <br /> seconded the motion. <br /> Councilmember Narum expressed her support for the motion and particularly specifying a length of time <br /> for employment. <br /> Councilmember Testa stated she preferred the earlier motion and this motion is inappropriate because <br /> it excludes people by employment. She stated the priority program should be more income-based. <br /> Councilmember Arkin stated she would like to see more occupational groups added but feels Council <br /> support does not exist. She stated her agreement with the idea of giving public servants one extra <br /> bonus point. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Balch/Arkin adopt and waive full reading of Resolution No. 21-1199 to <br /> approve Down Payment Assistance Program preferences for Pleasanton Unified School District, City of <br /> Pleasanton, and Alameda County employees, and employees of not-for-profit agencies providing social <br /> services to Pleasanton residents; reduce the bonus points for these groups from two to one; apply <br /> these changes to the Below Market Rate Rental Assistance Program's preference program; and <br /> mandate a six-month minimum term of employment. Motion passed by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Arkin, Balch, Narum, Mayor Brown <br /> Noes: Councilmember Testa <br /> Absent: None <br /> MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL <br /> Councilmember Testa, building upon the ADU debate, requested Council support, as last year's <br /> California Senate Bill 1120 has come back as Senate Bill 9. She noted the Councilmembers all <br /> received a letter from California Cities For Local Control asking State-wide for support through <br /> resolutions fighting their potential loss of local control under SB 9. She asked if a resolution could be <br /> adopted, even in general terms, stating the City does not stand for loss of local control and unfunded <br /> mandates being imposed by the State. <br /> Councilmember Testa stated her inquiry is to assess possible Council support and whether it would <br /> need to go through the Legislative Subcommittee. City Manager Fialho stated the resolution would <br /> have to be adopted by the Council. He added she could either schedule a resolution for the next <br /> City Council Minutes Page 15 of 17 January 19, 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.