My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
01-27
>
3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2021 3:26:56 PM
Creation date
1/20/2021 3:12:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/27/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
3_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\01-27
3_Exhibits A & C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\01-27
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2. Approval of the application with modifications. The Planning Commission could approve <br /> the CUP for the private school, but with a modified number of students, hours of <br /> operation, or with other changes to the proposal. <br /> Staff believes the proposed private school will not adversely impact the adjacent uses and the <br /> findings to approve the project could be made as proposed and conditioned. Therefore, staff <br /> recommends neither of the two project alternatives above be pursued. <br /> HACIENDA OWNERS ASSOCIATION <br /> The Hacienda Owners Association has reviewed the application and found it is in substantial <br /> compliance with Hacienda's guidelines set forth in the CC&R's (Covenants, Conditions and <br /> Restrictions). The Association believes the use is compatible with the currently approved uses <br /> within the subject area and, thereby, approved the proposed use. <br /> PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a <br /> 1 ,000-foot radius of the site. Staff has provided the location and notification map as Exhibit C <br /> for reference. At the time this report was published, staff received no comments or concerns. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> This project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California <br /> Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Therefore, <br /> no environmental document accompanies this report. <br /> SUMMARY/CONCLUSION <br /> As proposed and conditioned, staff believes the proposed private school would not adversely <br /> impact the surrounding uses. Conditions of approval have been included which will ensure the <br /> safety and general welfare of the surrounding area, and the City in general, is maintained. Staff <br /> has reviewed the proposed plans and proposal and believes there is sufficient parking on-site <br /> to accommodate this use. Staff believes the proposed use will fulfill a community need and the <br /> proposed location is appropriate for this use. <br /> Staff Planner: Jennifer Hagen, Associate Planner, 925-931-5607 or jhagen(a cityofpleasantonca.gov <br /> Reviewed/Approved By: <br /> Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager <br /> Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development <br /> P20-0992, 4301 Hacienda Drive, Suite 120 Planning Commission <br /> 7 of 7 <br />/employees on-site at any one time or alternative hours of <br /> operation. <br /> Traffic and Circulation <br /> The Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed the project narrative and plan and determined <br /> the proposed private school would not have significant impacts on the existing traffic levels, <br /> circulation, and parking. Therefore, a traffic or parking study was not required for this project. <br /> However, the applicant would be required to pay the City Traffic Impact Fee for increasing the <br /> number of students within the private school. If unanticipated impacts are observed, then the <br /> application may be brought back to the Planning Commission to impose additional mitigation <br /> measures. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> As outlined above, staff believes the use, as proposed and conditioned, would be compatible <br /> with the surrounding businesses and would not detrimentally affect the surrounding uses or <br /> properties and recommends the Planning Commission approve the project. However, <br /> alternatives to the proposal that could be considered by the Planning Commission include: <br /> 1. Denial of the application. Such an action would preclude the applicant from increasing <br /> the number of students in the private school; or <br /> P20-0992, 4301 Hacienda Drive, Suite 120 Planning Commission <br /> 6 of 7 <br />uite 120 Planning Commission <br /> 6of7 <br />