Site Location Number of Units Approximate
<br /> Density
<br /> Site #5: Brookline Loop, Mason Flats at 210 apartments 30 units/acre
<br /> Township Square (Pleasanton Gateway)
<br /> 97 detached units 5 units/acre
<br /> Site #6: 3150 Bernal Avenue, Vintage 345 units 30 units/acre
<br /> Apartments
<br /> Site #7: 4863 Willow Road, The Galloway 506 apartments 30 units/acre
<br /> Density Greater Than 30 units/acre
<br /> The Planning Commission expressed interest in receiving more information about projects that
<br /> had density greater than 40 units per acre. One example in Pleasanton is the Vintage
<br /> Apartments (Site #6 on the self-guided tour). In this project, although the average density
<br /> across the project site is 30 units per acre, actual density in different subareas of the site
<br /> varies, being at about 40 units/acre at the southeast corner of the site where the podium
<br /> building is located. Increasing the mass and density of this portion of the site allowed the units
<br /> along Bernal Avenue to be lower-density, two-story structures.
<br /> Other sites that were rezoned as part of the 2012 Housing Element were identified for greater
<br /> density than 30 units/acre (e.g., the site at Stoneridge Mall was rezoned at a density of 40
<br /> units/acre and the California Center site was rezoned at a density range of 35 to 40 units/acre);
<br /> Although a project was approved at California Center, and another is proposed at Stoneridge
<br /> Mall, neither of these projects have yet been constructed.
<br /> As the example of the Vintage Apartments demonstrates, building density and project density
<br /> may be different. Generally, building densities at or above 40 dwelling units per acre require
<br /> some form of structured parking. Conversely, the cost of structured parking makes podium
<br /> buildings uneconomical at densities less than 40 units per acre. Podium buildings (such as the
<br /> building at the southeast corner of Vintage Apartments) are often seen as desirable, because
<br /> this typology provides courtyards, increased open space, and better resident amenities than
<br /> can be achieved with typical surface-parked designs.
<br /> With the exception of Irby Ranch and Vintage Apartments, developers that proposed projects
<br /> on sites from the 2012 Housing Element generally proposed buildings that were uniformly
<br /> designed to the required site density. Since the site rezoned for the 2012 Housing Element
<br /> ranged from 30-35 units per acre, this development pattern generally resulted in homogenous
<br /> surface-parked projects and incentivized applicants to build to the lower end of allowed
<br /> densities to reduce their construction cost. The next Housing Element could provide an
<br /> opportunity to better encourage blended densities that would mix different building densities
<br /> across Housing Element sites.
<br /> Accordingly, as part of the Housing Element update, staff anticipates a discussion at both the
<br /> City Council and Planning Commission level on the most appropriate strategies to
<br /> accommodate the projected Regional Housing Needs Allocation. Staff suggests it will be more
<br /> timely to bring a focused discussion on housing densities greater than 30 units/acre to the
<br /> Planning Commission later in 2021 , in conjunction with the Housing Element process, framed
<br /> P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission
<br /> 3 of 10
<br />ommission
<br /> 5 of 10
<br />ble for SB35 streamlining.
<br /> P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission
<br /> 4 of 10
<br />e +� .�,� - `
<br /> Cio < °' cit 1 �,. t- ; t+ $.
<br /> 4000
<br /> park
<br /> t.
<br /> rr v m. ♦ k..a 'AY 4b 0f ; .t Zn 47R
<br /> w, 1� �s ,,,c,,,< 7?,T`➢ �' bs, is gds [^V I' J .7.no -
<br /> ..,e,iv+ y,-' >.io/ "� -.!4 �� •y rr `\-\ G, air L Jbz
<br /> '`i �! '� r !I '• \\`''' b'� t'i
<br /> �s < • 7 , ` P v gFtw� ' 4' `o, a • / ' iP °4. xov `yahj)ll
<br /> rErA'S-A4,7„..'r ® >3[RNAI ,(. qLlib �, A 5�,j
<br /> , c�I_I� BERN aL.
<br /> Ora a
<br /> 1:5.672
<br /> 0 0.05 0.1 „i P20-0987, Wells, CUP, 706 Main St
<br /> Planning Division _ a_, ,
<br /> , January 4,2021 I>r.
<br /> LE +j S. N
<br /> 0 355 710 Feet
<br /> |