My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
121520
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2020 3:01:16 PM
Creation date
12/9/2020 1:54:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/15/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
Document Relationships
12 ATTACHMENT 1 EXHIBIT B
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\121520
12 ATTACHMENT 1-3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\121520
12 ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\121520
12 ATTACHMENT 5-11
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\121520
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Date: December 11, 2020 <br /> <br />To: Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />From: Nelson Fialho, City Manager <br /> Brian Dolan, Assistant City Manager <br /> Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development <br /> <br />Subject: P19-0128/P19-0129 Public Storage: Supplemental Information Regarding Project <br />Valuation Methodology <br /> <br /> <br />The December 15, 2020 City Council Agenda Report provided a summary evaluation of the estimated <br />value of the requested increase in Floor Area Ratio for the Public Storage Project, as a means for the <br />City Council to more effectively evaluate the appropriate level of community benefits to be provided by <br />the project. This memorandum provides additional information on the methodology and assumptions <br />used to develop the estimate. Attachment 1 summarizes the calculation and specific factors applied, in a <br />spreadsheet format.1 <br /> <br />It is noted and acknowledged that there is considerable room for a different valuation to be calculated, <br />simply by adjusting one or more of the inputs in the model. However, staff believes that the valuation <br />reflects a fair and reasonable estimate, incorporating the insight and advice of a consultant, Economic & <br />Planning Systems (EPS) experienced in conducting similar analyses, and selecting inputs that reflect <br />widely available industry-standard factors and data, and incorporating local- and project-specific data <br />wherever possible. <br /> <br />Summary of Methodology <br />In very simple terms, the basis for the calculation is an assessment of the value of the property’s <br />additional square footage, minus the cost to construct that same square footage. The difference between <br />those two values indicates the potential contribution of the new square footage to the site’s land value. <br />Increases to land value that result from governmental actions, the additional square footage achieved <br />with the FAR increase in this case, is a well-accepted measure of the “windfall” that accrues to the land <br />owner. <br /> <br />The value of the property is established as its “net present value.” Net present value is a relatively <br />standard methodology used to calculate the value, today, of a property based on the future stream of <br />revenue or income it produces. It is useful in real estate transactions and in investment decisions, where <br />the current sales price of a property must be set or the value established based on assumptions about <br />future income. The net present value is shown in Attachment 1 as the “building valuation.” <br /> <br /> <br />1 The calculation has been updated to reflect the revised project; this minor change in square footage (minus 153 sq. ft.) does <br />not significantly affect the valuation. <br />DocuSign Envelope ID: E4D0AD6B-3F79-48DA-8B5E-017EB2A6132F
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.