My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
121520
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2020 3:01:16 PM
Creation date
12/9/2020 1:54:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/15/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
Document Relationships
12 ATTACHMENT 1 EXHIBIT B
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\121520
12 ATTACHMENT 1-3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\121520
12 ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\121520
12 ATTACHMENT 5-11
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\121520
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Option 3. Applicant request: Reduction of 98.8 percent for the entire project, <br /> aligning with actual employee impacts. Total fee would be $26,318. (Applicant's <br /> Request) <br /> 4. Option 4. Hybrid approach: Reduction of 0 percent for the office (consistent <br /> with past practice) and reduction of 98.8 percent for new storage area <br /> (consistent with actual employee generation). In this option, staff does not <br /> recommend charging the affordable housing fee for the square footage of the <br /> new unit. Total fee would be $37,892. <br /> 5. Option 5. Typical methodology approach. Reduction of 0 percent for the <br /> office and reduction of 97.3 percent for the new storage area, consistent with the <br /> widely used SANDAG employee generation rate for storage facilities, and the <br /> office component. In this option, staff does not recommend charging the <br /> affordable housing fee to the new unit. Total fee would be $68,973. (Staff <br /> Recommendation). <br /> Table 3- Fee Options <br /> Option 1 Option" 2 O n 3 I Optkm 4 00on 5 <br /> No Consistent Applicant Hybrid ri <br /> Reduction with"Past Request Approach Methodology <br /> Approvals <br /> Office Fee Rate $13.02 $13.02 $0.16 $13.02 $13.02 <br /> Unit Fee Rate $13.02 $13.02 N/A* $0 ! $0 <br /> Storage Fee Rate $13.02 $2.99 i $0.16 $0.16 $0.35 <br /> (77 percent (98.8 percent i (98.8 percent (97.3 percent <br /> reduction) ; reduction) reduction) reduction) <br /> Office Fee $11,718 $11,718 $144 $11,718 $11,718 <br /> Unit Fee $15,285 $15,285 N/A $0 $0 <br /> Storage Fee $2,129,890 $489,875 $26,174 26,174 $57,225 <br /> Total Fee $2,156,893 $516,878 $26,318 $37,892 $68,973 <br /> Fee as Proportion ! 100 percent 23.4 percent 1.2 percent 1.7 percent 3.2 percent <br /> of Non-Adjusted 1 <br /> Fee j <br /> *Manager's unit not reflected in applicant's original request. <br /> Quite clearly, the housing need created specifically by this project is significantly lower <br /> than that assumed in the Nexus Study for a typical industrial use. Based on the <br /> provisions in the PMC allowing a fee reduction, the Nexus Study's basis for the fee (i.e., <br /> assumed generation of 1 employee per 400 square-feet), actual employee generation <br /> (i.e., 5 employees), design of the building, and past precedent for approving such <br /> 6 1.2 percent of the employees assumed are being generated(5/414)with this project <br /> Page 15 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.