Laserfiche WebLink
from 8,000 square-feet per employee to 20,000 square-feet per employee. A number of <br /> nexus studies reviewed by staff utilized the rate established by the San Diego <br /> Association of Governments (SANDAG) (i.e., 15,000 square-feet/employee), and this <br /> number appears to be the most widely used in traffic studies and other analyses <br /> prepared by local governments. On this basis, while the proposed reduction is not <br /> dramatically different from the other studies reviewed, the 98.8 percent requested <br /> reduction, equivalent to 1 employee per -33,000 square-feet, is on the low end.5 <br /> If the SANDAG ratio (i.e., 15,000 square-feet/employee) were applied to the subject <br /> project, 11 employees would be generated (165,660 square-feet divided by 15,000) <br /> which would be 2.7 percent of the assumed employees (11 divided by 414). <br /> As described, there is also some historical precedent for reducing the Affordable <br /> Housing Fee for similar storage projects. The two examples with approved fee <br /> reductions cited above also generated far fewer employees than assumed (i.e., 1.65 <br /> percent and 1.29 percent). Both of those projects received fee reductions for the <br /> storage portion of the projects but not for the office nor manager's unit portions of the <br /> projects. The reduction in fees for the storage component alone was 78 percent and 77 <br /> percent, although it is unclear from reviewing the minutes and resolutions of the past <br /> approvals, exactly how these past reductions were established. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> Based on the project-specific information, including an employee rate significantly below <br /> that assumed in the Nexus Study to develop the current fee and design of the storage <br /> buildings, staff believes the criteria to grant the reduction would be met, and provides a <br /> sufficient basis to support the requested fee reduction. <br /> Nonetheless, it is acknowledged that there is discretion available to the Council in <br /> granting the request, and the Council could consider other options with respect to this <br /> request (including no reduction). Staff suggests the following options (please note, all <br /> dollar amounts are based on current fee rates, and rounded to the nearest dollar; actual <br /> amounts would vary based on fee in place at time of building permit issuance, but would <br /> reflect the proposed percentage reductions): <br /> 1. Option 1. No fee reduction: Reduction of 0 percent for entire project. Total fee <br /> would be $2,156,893. <br /> 2. Option 2. Reduce the fee, in a manner consistent with past practice: <br /> Reduction of 0 percent for the office and manager's unit and reduction of 77 <br /> percent (the lower of the two most recent fee requests that have been granted) <br /> for the storage. The total fee would be $516,878. <br /> 5 Studies reviewed include the San Diego Association of Governments(SANDAG)Traffic Generators Report;2007 <br /> Snohomish County Employee Density Study;and a March 2010 study Logistics Trends and Specific Industries that <br /> Will Drive Warehouse and Distribution Growth and Demand for Space prepared for the NAIOP:Commercial Real <br /> Estate Development Association. <br /> Page 14 of 18 <br />