My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 102820
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
PC 102820
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2020 4:25:39 PM
Creation date
12/7/2020 4:25:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/28/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Examples sent were Properties in many cases were 20 years old that had since been <br /> rebranded with huge orange stripes on top or they were acquisitions and they are what they <br /> are, they may have been brick or another material that were brick that are 20 years old <br /> Commissioner Balch asked if the renderings on Page 8 of the submitted plans were accurate <br /> or if the applicant was willing to modify them to remove the orange band. Mr. Miranda stated <br /> they were willing to remove the orange band on the three story building. <br /> Commissioner Balch withdrew his motion. Commissioner Pace withdrew his second. <br /> Commissioner Allen asked if the applicant was willing to remove the orange band from the <br /> single-story portion of the building. Mr. Miranda requested it remain. Commissioner Allen <br /> confirmed if or whether the Commission agreed the orange band could remain on the sales <br /> office and single stories. <br /> Commissioner Balch stated it was a significant compromise and agreed with keeping the <br /> orange band on the single-story buildings and the office as presented in the submitted plans. <br /> Commissioner Brown indicated approval of the white strip on the top and, with the applicant's <br /> concession, it went beyond his hesitations around the General Plan, which cemented his <br /> support. <br /> Commissioner Balch moved to approve Cases P19-0128 and P19-0129 subject to the <br /> revised draft Conditions of Approval, Exhibit A as modifications were provided in a staff <br /> memorandum, with an additional modification to conditions as referenced by the <br /> applicant regarding Condition 52 and the added condition to remove the orange-colored <br /> band on the three-story building. <br /> Commissioner Pace seconded the motion. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> AYES: Commissioners Balch, Brown, Pace, and Ritter <br /> NOES: Commissioner Allen <br /> ABSENT: Commissioner O'Connor <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> Resolution PC-2020-13 approving Cases P19-0128 and P19-0129 was adopted, as motioned. <br /> 6. P20-0412, Amendment to Title 18 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code — Consider <br /> amendments to Chapters 18.08, 18.28, 18.32, 18.36, 18.44, 18.46, 18.84, 18.88 and <br /> 18.106 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code to comply with state legislation for accessory <br /> dwelling units. <br /> Senior Planner Shweta Bonn presented the specifics of the item in the Agenda Report. <br /> Commissioner Balch inquired about the process for existing deed restrictions. Ms. Harryman <br /> stated she would draft a termination of deed restrictions that would extinguish the restriction for <br /> the title. She explained the termination would be provided to property owners upon them <br /> contacting the City. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 7 October 28, 2020 <br />they would reluctantly remove <br /> the orange on the third story, although he was originally under the impression that leaving it on <br /> the office was acceptable as Stanley Boulevard was more of a commercial street. He <br /> apologized for any misconception when discussing the colors with Commissioner Allen. He <br /> stated there were exceptions to everything, including the orange on the building, but clarified <br /> many of the examples Commissioner Allen provided without orange on the buildings were in <br /> many cases 20 years old and had since been rebranded with large orange stripes on the top or <br /> they were acquisitions of buildings that may have been brick or another material. He discussed <br /> the need to utilize the corporate colors and reminded the Commission of the massive <br /> improvement from the existing condition. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 7 October 28, 2020 <br />