Laserfiche WebLink
In response to Commissioner Allen, Ms. Campbell stated the units would not allow overnight <br /> habitation. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> Project Applicant Bryan Miranda gave a brief presentation on the item outlining the three <br /> changes since the last hearing. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> Commissioner Allen thanked the applicant for making the Planning Commission's requested <br /> adjustments but stated she had received information regarding the project since the <br /> August 12, 2020 Work Session. She stated she was not previously aware of the General Plan <br /> policies discouraging and minimizing the use of franchise colors. She indicated staff had <br /> worked with the applicant to remove as much of the orange color from the building as they <br /> were willing, although she had since found examples of Public Storage buildings without any <br /> orange. She also mentioned she was struck by the new visuals, particularly Page 10 of the <br /> submitted plans, and the view from Stanley Boulevard toward the Irby Ranch development. <br /> She expressed concern with the visual impact of the orange, which did not fit with the General <br /> Plan intent and was not complimentary to the design of the Irby Ranch development. She <br /> requested the orange be removed except near the sales office and expressed concern about <br /> setting a precedent which would allow franchises to use bright colors. <br /> Commissioner Brown asked about the General Plan language related to corporate branding. <br /> Commissioner Allen referenced multiple programs under Community Character Element Policy <br /> 15 and 16. Specifically, Community Character Element General Plan Policy 15 to encourage <br /> new commercial area development and redevelopment to incorporate attractive architectural <br /> and site design features; Program 15.3 includes, among a list of other features to be <br /> incorporated/encouraged in commercial buildings, "Attractive colors, minimizing bright <br /> franchise colors"; Policy 16 notes to discourage franchise and prototype architecture and <br /> signage; Program 16.1 calls for development applicants to modify formula design to more <br /> closely relate to and reinforce the special character of Pleasanton; and Program 16.2 <br /> encourages the use of higher quality graphic signage design and material. Community <br /> Development Director Ellen Clark provided a description of the related items in the Pleasanton <br /> Municipal Code (PMC) Design Review criteria. In response to Commissioner Brown, Ms. Clark <br /> confirmed those requirements covered the entire City, not just the Downtown. Commissioner <br /> Brown stated he was unaware of moving away from corporate colors. He stated he was <br /> hesitant to impose greater conditions, although he acknowledged its adjacency to a residential <br /> area. <br /> Commissioner Pace asked if the Planning Commission could approve the project with <br /> additional contingent requirements on colors. Ms. Clark confirmed the Commission could <br /> determine the appropriate amount of orange. Commissioner Pace stated the applicant had <br /> done a great job applying feedback from the August 12, 2020 Work Session and the only <br /> remaining concern was color. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 October 28, 2020 <br />