5 - Laserfiche WebLink

No architectural plans have been submitted for Building 1 by the applicant at this time. Staff notes the conceptual design nature, especially of later phases, in Exhibit B. The design details for Building 1 would be brought back to the Planning Commission for review as part of a future hearing. The applicant has provided site and building cross-sections (Figure 6) so the Planning Commission can review and provide feedback and direction regarding the proposed massing of the buildings as they relate to the surrounding area. The cross-sections are useful to visually display maximum height and general size of the proposed buildings in the field, but they do not represent the intended architectural detailing, which again would be provided for review at a future hearing. Figure 6: Proposed Site and Building Cross-sections dJLMIGi---- f :", / —3.I-I.- 'Elf RATA. m1 0.11'10.01 I H OO" 11 �vFn{!f MYf Y'M'EH 1. I ~■Ni MWJ~ 1 .-- 1-...IJ- sari fi ! e Amenities As noted above, the General Plan allows the project to have up to an FAR of 60-percent, however, an FAR greater than 35-percent requires sufficient amenities and mitigations to be incorporated into the project and greater than 60-percent requires minimal employee density and traffic generation. The proposed project is designed for the maximum FAR (i.e., approximately 60-percent). Currently, the applicant has not proposed any specific amenities and mitigations, although is aware of the requirement and would seek direction from the Planning Commission on this issue. Employee Density, Traffic, and Environmental Impacts Staff is currently working with the applicant to determine the proposed mix/quantities of land uses for the proposed project which will determine the ultimate employee density, and related traffic and environmental impacts. A complete evaluation of the proposed project will be conducted pursuant to CEQA to determine what, if any, significant environmental impacts would be created and/or require mitigation. PUD-139 and P20-0973, 10X Genomics, Inc. Planning Commission 9 of 12 , the ratio required by the agreements is relatively high compared to the PMC's typical ratios for uses similar to those proposed, and could potentially result in the project being "overparked" based on the project's anticipated employee density and the ultimate mix of land uses at full campus master plan buildout. Since these existing agreements expire in 2028, and it is likely the full campus master plan wouldn't be constructed until after this date, the applicant proposes an overall parking ratio of 3.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet for the entire campus master plan development at buildout. This lower parking ratio may allow for the total number of parking spaces, and size of the parking structure, to be reduced. The proposed project would continue to utilize all existing driveways described above, with the majority of vehicular access focused on Springdale Avenue, which would provide the main ingress and egress from parking areas. Building 1 would have entry and drop-off access from the existing driveway off Stoneridge Mall Road (ring road). Building l's service entry would be screened and integrated into the building design with access from the existing driveway off Springdale Avenue. Buildings 2 and 3 would also have an entry and drop-off point access from the existing driveway off Stoneridge Mall Road at the existing McWilliams Lane signal intersection. PUD-139 and P20-0973, 10X Genomics, Inc. Planning Commission 5of12