My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
111720
>
19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2020 3:04:50 PM
Creation date
11/12/2020 3:04:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/17/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
efficient and predictable way to complete the required GHG emissions impact analysis <br /> in a CEQA document. <br /> Based on the state targets, Pleasanton's emission reduction pathway should include a <br /> short-term target for 2030 and a long-term target for 2045 or 2050. The long-term target <br /> is intended to be aspirational and set the trajectory of emissions reductions. Both long- <br /> term state targets are currently set forth in Executive Orders, though B-55-18 is more <br /> likely to be codified. Since the long-term targets are 25-30 years out, changes to state <br /> and federal regulations are inevitable. Some of these changes (e.g., the recent <br /> Executive Order N-79-20, requiring sales of all new passenger vehicles to be zero- <br /> emission by 2035), will decrease Pleasanton's adjusted emissions forecast and others <br /> may increase the forecast (e.g., the federal Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) <br /> Vehicles Rule Part 2, which rolls back California fuel efficiency standards). The CAP will <br /> require an update around 2030 to assess emissions reductions, reevaluate new <br /> legislation, and incorporate updated technologies that emerge. <br /> Figure 3 below, indicates three potential CAP 2.0 target pathways that would allow for a <br /> Qualified GHG Reduction Plan based on current legislation. These pathways are all <br /> calculated per capita, to allow for population fluctuation, but can also be calculated as <br /> mass emissions. <br /> Figure 3- Potential Emission Reductions Pathways (Per Capita) <br /> 14.00 <br /> 12.2 <br /> 12.00 MT Per Capita <br /> 7.7 <br /> 10.00 MT Per Capita <br /> 8.00 <br /> SB 32 Target <br /> 6.00 5.00 MT Per Capita <br /> S-03-05 Target <br /> 4.00 4.11 1.34 MT Per Capita <br /> MT Per Capita <br /> 2.00 B-55-18 Target v� <br /> 0.00 0 MT Per Capita <br /> • <br /> 2005 2010 2015 2017 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 <br /> —*—SB 32/B-55-18 Per Capita Pathway —•- B-55-18 Per Capita Linear <br /> Pathway**Recommend pathway <br /> —6 •SB 32/S-03-05 Per Capita Pathway <br /> Per Capita Pathway Options Short-Term Target Long-Term Target <br /> SB32/B-55-18 Pathway 5 MT CO2e (2030) 0 MT CO2e (2045) <br /> SB32/S-03-05 Pathway 5 MT CO2e (2030) 1.34 MT CO2e (2050) <br /> • <br /> B-55-18 Linear Pathway 4.11 MT CO2e (2030) 0 MT CO2e (2045) <br /> Page 6 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.