My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
111720
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2020 2:40:20 PM
Creation date
11/12/2020 2:40:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/17/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and advised there is concern regarding the lack of clarity in the language. He advised staff <br /> recommends support with amendments. He recommends staff change their position from support to <br /> watch on AB 1506 as it was amended recently to require the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate <br /> officer-involved shootings and allows for the state to bill the local municipality for the work done by the <br /> DOJ. Lastly, he reported AB 1709 would expand the Use of Force legislation that was enacted under <br /> AB 392 (Weber) and noted it undermines the work that was done last year under AB 392. He advised <br /> staff recommends opposing the bill. <br /> Chief Swing reported on Policing - Employment Practices bills which include AB 1299 (Salas), SB 731 <br /> (Bradford), and SB 776 (Skinner). He reported AB 1299 would require agencies that employ police <br /> officers to notify the Commission of Peace Officer Standards and Training post when an officer <br /> separates from employment and to include the details of the termination or resignation in-lieu of <br /> termination if the officer leaves the agency and staff recommends supporting the bill. He reported SB <br /> 731 would provide that any threat or intimidation or coercion under the Tom Bain Civil Rights Act would <br /> be inherent in any interference with a civil right and would describe intentional acts for these purposes. <br /> He noted staff recommends opposing the bill unless amended. Lastly, he reported SB 776 would <br /> expand the disclosure that was initially met under SB 1421 (Skinner). He noted staff recommends <br /> opposing the bill unless amended and added it will be costly to implement and could be overly punitive. <br /> Chief Swing reported on Policing — Federal Reform and noted there are two tracks of federal legislation, <br /> one of which is to regulate what is defined as a chokehold and a control hold and the other is a <br /> database for law enforcement to publish and release a data of excessive force. He believes those bills <br /> will move forward after the election. <br /> In response to Councilmember Brown's inquiries, Chief Swing clarified he used his review of legislation <br /> along with information from the California Police Chiefs Association to guide his recommendations, <br /> explained the PPDs complaint retention policy is five-years and clarified he would like to have <br /> individuals with an intimate understanding of law enforcement be on the panel for decertifying a peace <br /> officer. <br /> City Manager Fialho clarified all police officers are required to have Peace Officer's Standards and <br /> Training (P.O.S.T.) certification from the state and a decertification would require a review body at the <br /> state level to determine whether or not the officer retains certification. <br /> In response to Councilmember Brown's inquiry. Chief Swing explained if an officer was unable to <br /> perform the essential functions of the job, they would not go through the decertification process. He <br /> further explained decertification would be for certain law violations such as acts of dishonesty, serious <br /> acts of misconduct, and gross misconduct. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum's inquiry, Chief Swing explained he could support AB 1196 if the <br /> language around positional asphyxia were clarified to provide a better understanding of when an officer <br /> would violate the bill. He also explained there were currently no consequences for violations in the <br /> language of the bill and the chokehold has not been allowed by PPD since the 1990s. Lastly, he <br /> advised the use of the carotid restraint has been suspended and if used, would result in an internal <br /> investigation and potential discipline. <br /> In response to Councilmember Pentin's inquiry, Chief Swing clarified he changed his position from <br /> support to watch on AB 1506 because the bill requires the DOJ to complete an investigation for officer- <br /> involved incidents and he believes there is a timeliness issue about their response and potential for <br /> uncontrolled costs. He further explained when an officer-involved incident takes place, the PPD, the <br /> Alameda County District Attorney's Office, and an Administrative Investigation by the PPD all take <br /> place in parallel. He confirmed that if the legislation were to create an opportunity to expand the role of <br /> the DOJ with the option for an agency to call them for assistance, he would support the bill. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 11 of 14 August 18, 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.