My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092320
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
PC 092320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2020 5:34:31 PM
Creation date
10/21/2020 5:34:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/23/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chair Ritter stated the Planning Commission would be taking the lead on the Housing Element <br /> Update and requested an update and reeducation ahead of formulating plans or voting on the <br /> matter. Commissioners Allen and Brown concurred. <br /> Commissioner Pace requested, in a broader context, updates in the coming meetings on the <br /> economic and health impacts on the community resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, as it <br /> related to Planning Commission considerations. Chair Ritter agreed. <br /> 9. Informational Update on Chick-fil-A, CIP 15525 Hopyard Road at Owens Drive and <br /> CIP 18531 Stoneridge Drive at 1-680 on ramp widening projects <br /> City Traffic Engineer Mike Tassano gave a presentation and an update on the information <br /> provided in the report. <br /> Chick-fil-A <br /> Commissioner Brown asked who owned the drive aisle between the drive through and <br /> Larkspur Landing. Mr. Tassano responded that a property management company handled all <br /> areas within the shopping center. He explained the assigned parking areas and confirmed the <br /> owner of Chick-fil-A had talked to the other owners including Larkspur Landing and they were <br /> amenable to the modifications. Commissioner Brown also asked if the flagger role was staffed <br /> during both lunch and dinner peak hours or just when Chick-fil-A was busy. Mr. Tassano <br /> discussed his observance of the flagger position and assumption that the flaggers were used <br /> during busy times. <br /> Chair Ritter asked if Chick-fil-A changed anything in the way they operated the drive through. <br /> Mr. Tassano discussed the delay in food preparation and sauce selection. He stated the sauce <br /> distribution was moved to a separate area. He explained the expansion of order locations and <br /> parking for mobile orders, which was only 10 percent of the orders. He discussed the potential <br /> need for an awning or weather structure and indicated the owner requested an expedited <br /> process, to which he advised him of the application process. <br /> Commissioner Brown inquired if there were any problems with vehicles using Johnson Court, <br /> ignoring the signage as a permanent solution. Mr. Tassano noted that Chick-fil-A has <br /> barricades preventing vehicles from entering the line from Johnson Court. <br /> Commissioner Allen asked when the red double stacking was expected to start. Mr. Tassano <br /> stated the request would be made if customers returned inside since sit down dining did not <br /> relieve the congestion. Commissioner Allen asked how the trips currently being seen for <br /> Chick-fil-A compared to the ones originally approved by the Planning Commission. Mr. <br /> Tassano stated it was originally approved as a regular fast-food restaurant, however, they <br /> were actually double the vehicles than a regular fast-food restaurant. He stated Chick-fil-A <br /> could have done more due diligence in providing more accurate trip numbers at the time of <br /> approval. Commissioner Allen then asked about the commercial offices opening at the former <br /> Denny's restaurant site. Ms. Denis responded they were currently going through plan check <br /> and were close to construction and stated the project would not come before Planning <br /> Commission again unless a particular business requested a use requiring a Conditional Use <br /> Permit. Commissioner Allen expressed concern about compounded problems with traffic with <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 5 September 23, 2020 <br />nutes Page 3 of 4 October 14, 2020 <br /> dwelling unit that is 800 <br /> square feet or less may be 16 feet in height regardless of the maximum height limits on the main structure,as prescribed by <br /> state law. <br /> P20-0412, Accessory Dwelling Units Planning Commission <br /> 3 of 7 <br />e and complicated. She further explained the City relied <br /> heavily on private developers in that section of town for completion of the trail. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 August 12, 2020 <br />ing/City Engineer. (Address this condition prior to <br /> permit issuance) <br /> P19-0128/P19-0129 Planning Commission <br /> Page 10 of 15 <br />ater from escaping to the north. The site grading must therefore be redesigned to provide an <br /> `emergency overland release' allowing storm water to escape the site before flooding the buildings <br /> or the neighboring properties to the west and east if the pipe network becomes plugged. (Address <br /> this condition prior to permit issuance). Project Specific Condition. <br /> P19-0128/P19-0129 Planning Commission <br /> Page 8 of 15 <br />