My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
10-28
>
5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2020 4:12:46 PM
Creation date
10/21/2020 1:44:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/28/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
5_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\10-28
5_Exhibits A & C-E
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\10-28
5_Exhibits F-J
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\10-28
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Employee Density and Traffic <br /> The proposed use will have no more than three employees on-shift at one time and will <br /> generate minimal traffic, compared to other uses that might occupy buildings of a similar size. <br /> The applicant provided a Trip Generation Traffic Analysis by a traffic engineering firm, Fehr <br /> and Peers which was reviewed and accepted by the City's Traffic Engineering Division (see <br /> Exhibit G). The Traffic Engineering Division concurs the project will have very low daily and <br /> peak trip generation and concludes the project is not expected to significantly impact the <br /> transportation system. <br /> Given the low density and minimal traffic impacts anticipated, staff suggests the proposed floor <br /> area ratio is acceptable. <br /> Consistency with Zoning District Regulations <br /> The proposal complies with the site development standards of the C-S District, as seen below <br /> in Table 1. <br /> Table 1: Site Development Conformance Table <br /> Site Development Standards <br /> CS-District Proposed Project <br /> Front Yard Setback 10' min. El 53' to the three-story storage building from the <br /> nearest front property line' <br /> RI 385' to the one-story storage building from the <br /> nearest front property line2 <br /> El 20' to the office from the front property line along <br /> Stanley Blvd <br /> Second Frontage on 10' min. El 22'-6"to the three-story storage building4 <br /> Nevada Street3 El 75' to the one-story storage buildings <br /> El 815' to the offices <br /> Side Yard Setbacks N/A El 33' to the east side and 230' to the west side for <br /> the three-story building <br /> El 25' to the west side and 230' to the east side for <br /> the one-story building <br /> El 9' to the east side and 40' to the west side for the <br /> office <br /> Floor Area Maximum 100% El 99.7%7 <br /> 1 -390' from Stanley Boulevard <br /> 2—589' from Stanley Boulevard <br /> 3 This lot is becoming a double frontage lot with the construction of Nevada Street. In the C-S zoning district the rear yard <br /> setback(10')and the front yard setback(10')are the same.As such,there are not changes to required setbacks. <br /> 4 This assumes the easement width along the south side of the property will be reduced from 104' wide to a varying width of <br /> approximately 72'-98'feet wide as seen on Sheet C 1 of Exhibit B. The building is setback 12' to the exiting easement,which <br /> complies with the 10' minimum. <br /> 5 This assumes the easement width along the south side of the property will be reduced.The building is setback 52' to the <br /> exiting easement,which complies with the 10' minimum. <br /> 6 This assumes the easement width along the south side of the property will be reduced.The building is setback 805' to the <br /> exiting easement,which complies with the 10' minimum. <br /> This assumes the easement width along the south side of the property will be reduced,which results in a lot area of 250,464- <br /> square-feet. The project will have a FAR of greater than 100%if the easement width is not reduced.As such, Exhibit A <br /> includes two conditions of approval(#14 and 42)addressing the necessary easement width reductions. <br /> P19-0128/P19-0129 Public Storage Planning Commission <br /> 7 of 15 <br />of the facility, the project will be minimizing its emissions footprint. <br /> Staff suggests that the amenities and mitigations are sufficient to justify the proposed floor <br /> area ratio. <br /> P19-0128/P19-0129 Public Storage Planning Commission <br /> 6 of 15 <br />additional gated entry from Nevada Street will be for emergency access only. <br /> P19-0128/P19-0129 Public Storage Planning Commission <br /> 4of15 <br />