Laserfiche WebLink
other cities in Alameda County have a similar buffer, but it does not apply to private schools or tutoring <br />facilities or other types of private businesses. <br />Assistant City Attorney Seto stated that the Planning Commission clarified its recommendation, wanting <br />either the `grandfathering' to be more strict, asking that it only occur along with the requirement that <br />tobacco stores and retailers not display their tobacco products; or if not then prohibit all tobacco sales <br />within the 1,000 foot buffer and provide 12-18 months before enforcement. <br />Assistant City Attorney Seto noted that Staff's recommendation is to adopt the 1,000 -foot buffer for new <br />tobacco sales and grandfather existing businesses like all other cities which adopted buffers. An <br />alternative recommendation is to adopt Planning Commission's recommendation to prohibit all tobacco <br />sales within that buffer. This was also the Youth Commission's recommendation. <br />Assistant City Attorney Seto stated that the fourth item discussed from the ordinance is delegation to the <br />City Manager to establish a Tobacco Retailer Licensing (TRL) program. In February, Council indicated <br />they wanted a program with `teeth' which included fines, suspension, and TRL revocation. <br />Assistant City Attorney Seto stated the final item proposes updating the code to provide that possession <br />of tobacco products by persons under 21 would be subject to confiscation and referral to counseling. This <br />would not impose any criminal penalties or fines for possession. <br />Assistant City Attorney Seto advised that if the ordinance is introduced tonight and adopted at the May <br />19, 2020 Council meeting, it would become legally effective on June 20, thirty days after adoption. Staff <br />recommends that the provisions regarding the 1,000 -foot buffer, TRL, and possession by persons under <br />21 go into effect immediately. Staff further recommends that the prohibition on the sale of flavored <br />tobacco and electronic smoking devices be delayed for 12 months to give retailers the opportunity to sell <br />their current inventory and update their business model. Assistant City Attorney Seto presented <br />alternative effective dates for prohibition on the sale of flavored tobacco and electronic smoking devices <br />as follows: <br />• November 6, 2020 <br />6 months after introduction <br />• December 21, 2020 <br />6 months after effective date <br />• January 1, 2021 <br />beginning of the new year <br />• May 6, 2021 <br />12 months after introduction <br />• June 21, 2021 <br />12 months after effective date (recommended) <br />• Unknown <br />6-12 months after lifting of shelter -in-place for retail stores <br />In response to Mayor Thorne, Assistant City Attorney Seto replied that she has seen a 6 -month <br />implementation delay in Dublin and unincorporated areas of Alameda County. She also confirmed that <br />Council is still considering minimum package sizes and pricing, use of coupons, and the effective date. <br />In response to Councilmember Narum, Assistant City Attorney Seto confirmed that staff recommends <br />that Council adopt an ordinance to delegate authority to the City Manager to adopt an administrative <br />policy that would require every tobacco retailer to be licensed and to adhere to the prohibitions and <br />penalties put in place with the new ordinance. <br />City Council Minutes Page 3 of 8 May 5, 2020 <br />