My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
100620
>
02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2021 1:28:15 PM
Creation date
9/30/2020 1:41:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/6/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tracy Farhad, noted that it is National Travel and Tourism Week and remarked on the negative impacts <br />that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on travel and tourism but anticipates that the Tri -Valley tourism <br />industry will rebound. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br />7. Public Hearing: Consider information about minimum package sizes and prices for tobacco <br />products, and introduce an ordinance based on approvals from February 18, 2020 to: (1) prohibit <br />the sale of flavored tobacco citywide; (2) prohibit the sale of electronic smoking devices and related <br />paraphernalia citywide; (3) prohibit new tobacco sales within 1,000 feet of public schools, parks and <br />recreation centers; (4) delegate implementation of tobacco retailer licensing (TRL); and (5) address <br />possession of tobacco products by persons under age 21 by amending Municipal Code Chapter <br />9.32 and Title 18 <br />Assistant City Attorney Larissa Seto stated that this item is returning to Council after being introduced at <br />the meeting of February 18, 2020. At that meeting, Staff was asked to return with information about <br />minimum package size and pricing for tobacco products as well as to revise the ordinance. <br />Assistant City Attorney Seto stated that federal law requires cigarettes to be sold in minimum packs of <br />20 and that there are no other federal or state laws setting minimum package sizes or pricing for tobacco <br />products. Although there are some cities in Alameda County that have minimum package sizes and <br />pricing, none of those cities are in the Tri -Valley. Staff recommendation remains that Council should not <br />adopt minimum package sizes or pricing. This is based partially on a study from UCSF whose findings <br />indicate that underage students in communities with demographics similar to Pleasanton are using higher <br />priced tobacco products as well as the fact that the ordinance prohibits sales of flavored tobacco and e - <br />cigarettes, which are the products most favorable by underage users. <br />Assistant City Attorney Seto stated that alternatively, Council may direct Staff to prepare an ordinance <br />based on the similarity of cigarettes to little cigars and cigarillos and higher priced minimums like those <br />in other cities in Alameda County. <br />Assistant City Attorney Seto then stated that of the other parts of the ordinance, Council was most <br />interested in prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco city-wide with no exemptions. A speaker at the <br />February 18th meeting requested that Council make an exemption of loose, flavored pipe tobacco and <br />premium flavored cigars costing at least $7 per cigar because young people are not interested in these <br />products. Assistant City Attorney Seto informed that the City of Livermore introduced similar exemptions <br />in March 2020 but is currently reconsidering these exemptions. <br />Assistant City Attorney Seto stated that the second item Council considered as part of this ordinance was <br />the prohibition of electronic smoking devices and related paraphernalia, with no exceptions. These <br />prohibitions are in place in the cities of Livermore and Dublin and in unincorporated Alameda County. <br />Assistant City Attorney Seto commented that the third item discussed as part of this ordinance was not <br />allowing new tobacco sales within 1,000 feet of public schools, parks, and recreation facilities but would <br />`grandfather' existing retailers and tobacco stores without allowing them to expand or relocate. Some <br />City Council Minutes Page 2 of 8 May 5, 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.