Laserfiche WebLink
BACKGROUND <br />On March 16, 2020, Alameda County issued its first Shelter in Place Public Health <br />Order to stop the spread of COVID-19; on March 17, 2020, the City of Pleasanton <br />declared a local emergency. The County's action immediately limited all restaurants to <br />take-out and delivery only, which substantially impacted income and thus the ability to <br />pay for operating and staffing expenses. <br />Prior to COVID-19, most restaurants that focused their operating model on in-person <br />dining did not have the needed infrastructure to support a delivery service model that <br />became essential once the shutdown was imposed. The availability of third -party food <br />delivery services has helped to fill that gap although at a significant cost to the <br />restaurants, in some cases up to 30 percent of the purchase price of the items ordered. <br />For restaurants that already operate with slight profit margins, these costs are <br />challenging to absorb. Further, restaurants have limited bargaining power to negotiate <br />lower fees with third -party platforms, and state anti -gouging laws do not provide <br />protection for such food delivery services. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The City has heard from local restaurateurs who have confirmed increasing delivery <br />fees from third -party food delivery companies during COVID-19 emergency. Capping <br />food delivery service fees at 15 percent per order will help to ensure the continued <br />operation of local restaurants and retain reasonable delivery service income for third - <br />party platforms during the local emergency. The 15 percent cap is based on the <br />experience of other California cities that have already adopted fee ceilings or similar <br />caps as a reasonable emergency regulation. <br />The urgency ordinance also prohibits a third -party food delivery service from reducing <br />the compensation, including any tip or gratuity, paid to any of its workers or the <br />restaurant because of the cap. If a restaurant or food delivery service worker alleges <br />that a delivery service provider has violated the urgency ordinance, the urgency <br />ordinance requires that a notice of alleged violation be given to the food delivery service <br />provider who will have seven calendar days to cure any alleged violations (such as <br />issuing a refund or adjusting its mobile applications for ordering). Should this written <br />notice fail to cure the violation, the individual or restaurant would have the ability to file a <br />civil action in court to seek damages or injunctive relief to stop the violation from <br />continuing to occur. <br />Following adoption by at least a four-fifths vote of the City Council, the urgency <br />ordinance will go into effect and be enforced immediately, and will remain in effect until <br />an expiration date of one year from the effective date, or upon termination of the local <br />state of emergency, whichever occurs first; or as otherwise terminated, modified, or <br />extended by the City Council. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />