Laserfiche WebLink
response to Councilmember Testa's inquiry, Ms. Layman advised the Sunflower Hills project in <br />Livermore not moving forward. <br />Laura Danielson expressed concern with the lack affordable housing, new schools, and housing for <br />special needs and veterans. She encouraged the Council to allow community input. <br />Don Kahler, Pleasanton Gravel Company, expressed his opposition for developing the EPSP citing <br />safety concern regarding trespassers swimming and fishing on the property. <br />Alfred Exner expressed his opposition for developing the EPSP and encouraged the City Council <br />to hire an independent Urban Planner to plan the property. <br />Jeff Schroeder, Ponderosa Homes, expressed his support for developing the EPSP and looks <br />forward to working with Pleasanton to develop affordable housing. In response to Councilmember <br />Testa's inquiry, Mr. Schroeder advised Ponderosa Homes has a plan based on the EPSP but it is <br />an open slate. He also confirmed there would be the plan of a business park and is open to all <br />proposed uses. In response to Councilmember Pentin's inquiry, Mr. Schroeder noted the first stage <br />develops an EPSP and a development agreement, but many things need to occur before design <br />can take place. He noted if everything was in place today, it would take approximately six years <br />before a house could be built. <br />Doug Miller expressed his support for developing the EPSP and encouraged City Council to develop <br />affordable housing for veterans. <br />David Caldwell expressed his support for developing the EPSP and encourage City Council to <br />develop affordable housing for veterans. <br />Mayor Thorne tabled the public comment for a future City Council meeting. <br />MOTION: It was m/s by Pentin/Narum to continue this item to a future City Council meeting. Motion <br />passed by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Narum, Pentin, Testa, Mayor Thorne <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />12. Public Hearing Consider introduction of an ordinance to amend Chapter 9.32 and Title 18 of the <br />Municipal Code to: restrict the sale of flavored tobacco and electronic smoking devices; restrict <br />tobacco sales within 1,000 feet public schools, parks and recreation facilities; require tobacco <br />retailer licensing; and address possession of tobacco products by persons under 21 <br />Assistant City Attorney Larissa Seto reviewed the five proposed amendments to the City's Municipal <br />Code as related to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products and electronic smoking devices, <br />restricting tobacco sales within 1 000 feet of public schools, parks and recreation facilities, requiring <br />tobacco retailer licensing; and addressing possession of tobacco products by persons under 21. <br />She provided background information regarding the City's existing restrictions, federal and state <br />laws related to limitations on flavored electronic smoking devices, and proposed legislation to <br />prohibit favored tobacco items. She reported City's Commissions have hosted several meetings on <br />this matter, in particular the City's Youth Commission, who brought the research and the item to the <br />City's attention. <br />Assistant City Attorney Seto reported on the impact of underage usage and public health impacts, <br />including underage access to tobacco products and e -cigarettes. Police Department information <br />was presented regarding underage purchases of flavored tobacco and e -cigarettes. The distinctions <br />City Council Minutes Page 7 of 14 February 18. 2020 <br />