My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
08-26
>
5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2020 1:30:07 PM
Creation date
8/19/2020 12:51:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/26/2020
Document Relationships
5_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\08-26
5_Exhibits A, C & D
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\08-26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
spaces). As such, the project requires 12 parking spaces total for the existing commercial and <br /> proposed residential. <br /> Additionally, the PMC outlines required parking space dimensions (i.e., 10 feet by 20 feet in a <br /> garage/carport and 9 feet by 19 feet for uncovered standard-sized spaces). Compact parking <br /> spaces must be a minimum of 8 feet by 16 feet and a maximum of 40-percent of the parking <br /> may be compact spaces. The PMC also details minimum aisle widths behind parking spaces <br /> and notes that each parking space shall have unobstructed access from the street without <br /> moving another vehicle. Staff notes the interior dimensions of the lift parking are not provided <br /> (but they appear to be compact based on the exterior dimensions), some of the parking <br /> dimensions do not comply with the PMC requirements, and too many compact spaces are <br /> proposed (i.e., 67-percent). The plans submitted with the formal Design Review Application will <br /> need to comply with the PMC parking dimensions and maximum allowed percentage of <br /> compact spaces. <br /> The main questions at hand relate to the parking lift. A parking lift has never been proposed as <br /> part of a project in Pleasanton and it is a policy decision/interpretation as to whether any of the <br /> lift spaces can count toward meeting the parking spaces required by the PMC. <br /> Staff's determination/recommendation is that the top two parking spaces in the lift should not <br /> count toward meeting the PMC parking requirements as they do not have "unobstructed <br /> access to the street." However, one question for the Commission's consideration is if the two <br /> lower spaces of the parking lift could count toward meeting the PMC required parking <br /> (assuming the interior lift dimensions meet the minimum required dimensions). The spaces are <br /> technically unobstructed; however, they are part of the lift structure and may be assigned to <br /> specific users such as office employees. If the bottom spaces of the lift can count toward <br /> meeting the required off-street parking spaces, the project would provide 10 of 12 required <br /> spaces per the PMC. If not, the project would provide 8 of 12 required spaces per the PMC. <br /> The PMC allows an applicant in the Downtown Revitalization District who is unable to provide <br /> all the required off-street parking required by Code, to apply for an in-lieu parking agreement. <br /> The agreement would require the applicant to pay in-lieu parking fees for the number of <br /> spaces the project is deficient in parking. As such, staff is also looking for feedback from the <br /> Commission regarding support (or lack of support) for an in-lieu agreement and fee payment <br /> for 2 or 4 spaces (the quantity is determined by the answer to the first question posed to the <br /> Commission). <br /> Downtown Specific Plan: As aforementioned, Downtown Specific Plan Policy LD-P.20 <br /> requires the project to be fully parked on-site if ground-floor residential is proposed. The DSP <br /> does not indicate the type of parking that may be used for complying with the policy and the <br /> Commission has some discretion regarding compliance with the policy. The lift potentially <br /> offers a creative solution to meet parking requirements per the DSP, though this is not a <br /> parking solution that has been proposed or accepted in the City to date. Several Bay Area <br /> cities do allow use of parking lifts as a means to satisfy parking requirements. If the parking lift <br /> is supported as a parking solution to meet the DSP policy, the site will still be deficient for <br /> purposes of the PMC parking requirements as noted above but will comply with the DSP <br /> P20-0568, 218 Ray Street Planning Commission <br /> 8 of 11 <br />