My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
051920
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2020 3:32:23 PM
Creation date
5/14/2020 3:31:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
there is not overwhelming support for an increase in the assessment amount, the HOA <br /> is interested in exploring the cost and benefit aspects of an increase. <br /> With the assessment of two city-owned parcels, the City will pay $1,121.06 ($560.53 <br /> each). <br /> Increases to Assessments <br /> Assessments in each of the districts will remain unchanged this fiscal year. As stated in <br /> this report and in previous reports, assessments have not been increased in the LMDs <br /> since they were created. Therefore, the current assessments are based upon operation <br /> and maintenance costs, and capital replacement costs, that existed at the time the <br /> LMDs were created. The districts have operated year-to-year through a combination of <br /> reducing maintenance and depleting capital replacement reserves. This is due in large <br /> part to the complicated process required to increase assessments created by the <br /> passage of Proposition 218 in 1996. However, annual costs have continued to increase, <br /> and capital reserves have been depleted to the point now that this operational strategy <br /> is no longer sustainable. The revenue in some districts, as detailed above, is no longer <br /> enough to cover the operational costs. This strategy also resulted in depleting the <br /> reserves needed for eventual capital replacement. <br /> City Staff, in consultation with SCI Consulting Group, a consultant that specializes in the <br /> formation of LMDs, began the analysis and Proposition 218 compliant voting procedure <br /> to increase assessments for the two most underfunded LMDs, Windsor and Bonde <br /> Ranch, but the voting process was put on hold due to the County's shelter-in-place <br /> order associated with the Covid-19 pandemic. <br /> This coming year the City will be working to determine maintenance expectations and <br /> appropriate maintenance standards for each district, and will determine the appropriate <br /> reserve amount to cover eventual capital replacements. When complete, required <br /> assessment increases will be calculated. The goal for each LDM with this effort is to <br /> fully understand the funding required to implement a sustainable landscape <br /> maintenance program in accordance with PUD requirements and the expectations of <br /> those residents living in the affected special assessment district, as well as to grow the <br /> capital reserve with an annual contribution to fund eventual replacement based upon an <br /> anticipated replacement cycle. <br /> The assessments will not be increased for this coming year's maintenance. The <br /> information contained within this report regarding the need to increase assessments, <br /> and the plan to have the residents in each special district consider and vote on an <br /> assessment increase, is informational only with respect to the proposed public hearing <br /> and action before City Council on June 16, 2020. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Staff provides general information to residents within the Landscape and Lighting <br /> Maintenance Districts as a part of the public notice for confirmation of the Engineer's <br /> Report. This annual notice provides the name and phone number of a staff contact <br /> person should questions arise. While assessments will not increase as a result of this <br /> year's Engineer's Report, it is expected that the plan outlined in this report to ask <br /> Page 7 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.