My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
050520
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2020 4:54:47 PM
Creation date
4/30/2020 4:54:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/5/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Amy Shannon spoke as a parent and public health professional regarding tobacco use and the <br /> ease of access to tobacco products for underage youth. She encouraged the use of a buffer <br /> and to honor the recommendations of the Youth Commission. She suggested consideration of <br /> enforcement mechanisms and reminded the Commission of the City's goal to promote healthy <br /> community. <br /> Rosalyn Moya referenced the 1,000-foot buffer and density pertaining to deciding the bigger <br /> distance. She referenced the tobacco use licenses and demonstrated various product <br /> packaging and marketing geared towards youth. <br /> Pleasanton Resident Helena Jin spoke regarding the Youth Commission's study that 74 <br /> percent of youth obtained tobacco products through a retail store. She referenced the numbers <br /> of youth playing in the parks or at recreation facilities each day. She suggested the City of <br /> Pleasanton act, like the neighboring cities adopting ordinances. <br /> Jannell Gladen, mother to two teen boys and Tri-Valley resident, discussed her work in <br /> schools and with youth. She stated her son began vaping between fifth and sixth grade. She <br /> suggested limiting access to youth, to help curb usage. She expressed concern with the <br /> visibility of advertisements for tobacco and vape products. She suggested the City have <br /> consistent policies with surrounding cities. <br /> Kristie Wang, mother of two teenage children, referenced the effect of the ordinance passed by <br /> the City of Livermore, which became effective January 1, 2020. She discussed enforcement <br /> and the support and advocacy of the Livermore Police Department. She stated youth were <br /> going to other cities to get their products. <br /> Government Relations Director for American Cancer Society— Cancer Action Network Jen <br /> Grand-Lejano encouraged a strong, 1,000-foot buffer zone near youth areas and not <br /> exempting tobacco shops. She discussed California Department of Health data on the sale of <br /> tobacco products to youth by tobacco retailers and marketing towards youth. She urged the <br /> Commission to adopt the proposed resolution. <br /> Property owner of the Valero/7-Eleven gas station on Santa Rita Road Mike Rosebery <br /> discussed the monthly tobacco products sales at his store, the majority being cigarettes, and <br /> the impact the ordinance would have on his business. He stated he was a proponent of"going <br /> dark" and restricting tobacco-related advertisements from the youth. He indicated support of <br /> reducing the sale of vaping products. <br /> Seventh grade student Connor Lam indicated support of the 1,000-foot buffer. He referenced <br /> his former Physical Education teacher who asked students not to smoke and discussed vaping <br /> by youth. He discussed restrictions in surrounding cities and urged the Commission to approve <br /> the ordinance prohibiting the sale of tobacco products within 1,000 feet of schools. <br /> Brad Hirst indicated support for social responsibility but encouraged individual responsibility. <br /> He provided statistics on tobacco use and reminded the Commission that State law required <br /> individuals to be 21-years of age to purchase tobacco products. He expressed concern with <br /> government over regulation. <br /> Excerpt: Draft Planning Commission Minutes, January 15, 2020 Page 4 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.