My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
050520
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2020 4:54:47 PM
Creation date
4/30/2020 4:54:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/5/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Allen inquired about "going dark" and the issue surrounding advertising and the <br /> presence of the product. She questioned enforcement and whether tobacco should be licensed <br /> by the City. <br /> Ms. Seto responded that tobacco retailer licensing (TRL) was an option in many of the cities <br /> within Alameda County. She summarized the internal discussions and determined there was <br /> not capacity to license and monitor those uses. She discussed stings by the Police Department <br /> and the Code Enforcement process for "going dark." <br /> Commissioner Allen inquired about the level of change that could be expected if the City <br /> grandfathered existing retailers. She asked how long the existing, affected businesses had <br /> been in business as a tobacco retailer. She requested historical data surrounding current <br /> tobacco retailers. <br /> Ms. Seto responded that gathering historical data would be a timely project for staff but that <br /> could be undertaken. <br /> Ms. Clark referenced the types of businesses currently selling tobacco-related products and <br /> indicated that change could be slow. <br /> Chair Ritter inquired about enforcement, fines issued and whether there was a three-strikes <br /> law. <br /> Ms. Seto stated offenders were reported to the State, which might jeopardize their license. <br /> Commissioner Balch inquired about the City of Pleasanton Police Department's enforcement <br /> when conducting a sting operation and the rate of passage. <br /> Ms. Seto referenced a recent sting in August 2019 and indicated that four of the 20+ <br /> businesses were not compliant. <br /> Chair Ritter inquired about theft and use of fake identification. He thanked the Youth <br /> Commission for its involvement. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> Resident of Livermore Kyoko Takayama addressed the Commission regarding the epidemic of <br /> vaping and the impact on her six grandchildren. She referenced the moral issue behind the <br /> sale of tobacco, regardless of whether it was legal. <br /> Tobacco Control Program Director of Alameda County Public Health Official Paul Cummings <br /> explained that clerks would be fined if there was no retail licensing. He stated an ordinance <br /> would provide the City with the ability to set appropriate penalties. He discussed the exemption <br /> in the City of Oakland for adult only retailers. He thanked the Planning Commission for its <br /> consideration and the Youth Commission for its input. <br /> Representative from Breathe California Audrey Abadilla shared studies and evidence <br /> pertaining to buffers and health risks with tobacco sales and use. <br /> Excerpt: Draft Planning Commission Minutes, January 15, 2020 Page 3 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.