Laserfiche WebLink
Commercial, Business and Professional Offices to Mixed Use and be rezoned from <br /> Commercial-Regional(mall) (C-R)(m)) to Planned Unit Development-Mixed Use (PUD-MU). As <br /> proposed, the mixed-use designation would not increase the total allowable residential <br /> development beyond was what originally anticipated within the Housing Element. As noted <br /> earlier in this report, the applicant would qualify for a 35 percent State Density Bonus above <br /> what the City's General Plan and Zoning allow for this site. As proposed, the commercial <br /> development would reflect the same square footage as approved under Design Review <br /> application P18-0340 and would not change or increase the future development capacity as <br /> approved by the mall's Development Agreement. <br /> Staff's has initially evaluated the proposed site plan and compared it to the previously <br /> submitted proposal that would have separated the commercial and residential projects. It <br /> appears that allowing the commercial and residential developments to integrate across the two <br /> parcels would create a better design and overall layout, allow the applicant greater flexibility to <br /> meet the Design Guidelines, and improve several characteristics of the project including <br /> overall pedestrian circulation and connectivity, and character of the street frontage. However, <br /> prior to moving forward with more detailed plans, staff is seeking the Planning Commission's <br /> initial comments on whether the necessary General Plan Amendment and Rezoning to mix the <br /> residential and commercial developments, while not increasing the overall allowable density or <br /> commercial square footage, appears to be supportable. <br /> Discussion Point #1 <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission support the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning to mix <br /> the residential and commercial development while not increasing the overall allowable <br /> density or commercial square footage of either project? <br /> Site and Building Layout <br /> As proposed, the lifestyle fitness facility would be moved to the southeast corner of the site. <br /> The lifestyle fitness facility's outdoor amenity area (e.g., pool or outdoor sports courts) would <br /> be adjacent to the intersection of Stoneridge Mall Road and Stoneridge Mall Road with the <br /> three-story fitness building located west of the amenity area. The largest of the residential <br /> buildings (Building Al) would then be located at the northeast portion of the site where the <br /> fitness facility was previously located on the approved plan. Access to all buildings and <br /> amenities would be from two main internal streets that cross through the project creating two <br /> main intersections off of Stoneridge Mall Road along the east and south frontages. The internal <br /> drive aisles would connect and tie into portions of the mall's existing internal drive aisles. As <br /> part of the project review, an updated Traffic Analysis will be prepared, which will include <br /> review of the project's on and off-site site access and circulation. The traffic analysis will be <br /> provided in conjunction with the Planning Commission's formal review of the project. <br /> Since the plans being presented to the Commission are preliminary and incomplete, staff is <br /> only asking for the Commission's "high-level" input regarding the general site layout and <br /> positioning of the buildings. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to refine the project in <br /> several areas to comply with the Design Guidelines including: design of the internal <br /> streets/drives (i.e., separated sidewalks, planter strips with street trees, on-street parking, etc.); <br /> building setbacks; quantity and location of private and common open space; quantity of <br /> resident amenities (e.g., pool, tot-lot, etc.); bedroom mix; and so on. <br /> PUD-136 Workshop, Stoneridge Shopping Center Planning Commission <br /> 12 of 14 <br />