Laserfiche WebLink
the commission to provide anything other than that and felt the EVC should be taking care of <br /> this. He had concerns about data that was provided and would rather support any need that <br /> vaping might be providing. <br /> Commissioner Sedlak felt the Human Services Commission should be looking at writing <br /> ordinances to find help for those suffering from use of these products. Commissioner Clare <br /> also commented on the responsibilities of the Human Services Commission. <br /> Commissioner Gohil discussed the problem with youth vaping and felt the focus of the <br /> recommendations should be put on helping with that and not having such a broad scope. <br /> Commissioner Clare commented on the commission not feeling comfortable in making a <br /> determination other than this matter being a problem that needs to be recognized and they <br /> could support. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Sedlak, seconded by Commissioner Gohill, <br /> recommending not moving forward to City Council with the five (5) ordinance <br /> recommendations made by the Youth Commission. <br /> Commissioners discussed the motion and the motion was withdrawn by Commissioner Sedlak. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Carlucci, seconded by Commissioner Sedlak, <br /> recommending support of only Ordinance #5 provided by the Youth Commission <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> AYES: Commissioners Carlucci, Clare, Rubino-Brumm, and Sedlak. <br /> NOES: Commissioner Gohill and Chairperson Parikh <br /> ABSENT: Commissioners Hayes and Powers <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> Commissioner Clare stated that suggested Ordinance 1 through 4 are important but the <br /> Human Services Commission feels it doesn't have all the information to make <br /> recommendations. Commissioner Sedlak discussed the amount of staff time spent on this and <br /> everyone should read everything and obtain as much information on the issue as possible. <br /> 5. Review and Approve the Draft Request for Qualifications for Health Care and <br /> Behavioral Health in Pleasanton <br /> Mr. Ingram noted that during the 2018 Housing and Human Services Grant HHSG) agenda <br /> item, City Council authorized staff and the Human Services Commission to explore a multi- <br /> year service agreement concept to address some of the critical human service needs in the <br /> Tri-Valley. He advised that at the commission's August 7, 2019 meeting commissioners <br /> identified health care and behavior health as the most critical human service need that could <br /> be addressed through a multi-year contract and a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process <br /> with a recommendation $35,000 be set aside annually from the HHSG process to fund this <br /> multi-year service contract. <br /> Human Services Commission <br /> December 4, 2019 <br /> Page 5 <br />