My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
021820
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2020 2:25:59 PM
Creation date
2/12/2020 2:25:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/18/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
NOTES
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DISCUSSION <br /> Windsor Landscape Maintenance District 1993-1 <br /> The Windsor subdivision (District 1993-1) has 90 parcels; the district has been in place <br /> for 26 years. Maintenance in this district includes masonry walls, trees, shrubbery, <br /> groundcover, irrigation systems, entry features and common area drainage ditches; <br /> along with furnishing all water and power for the irrigation system situated in Lot A, on <br /> the northeast side of Tapestry Way and Minton Court, in the northwest corner of the <br /> subdivision, and Lot C in the southwest corner of the subdivision (Tract 6320). <br /> The current district assessment revenue is insufficient to fund the maintenance at the <br /> same level as in past years. The cash reserve for the district has been depleted due to <br /> inflation, the ever-increasing cost of water and maintenance services, the aging <br /> irrigation system, and previously installed plant material and improvements. City Staff <br /> continues to work to increase the efficiency of landscape maintenance operations. <br /> Every property within the Windsor Landscape Maintenance District is also a member of <br /> the Windsor at Laguna Oaks Homeowners Association. Staff has met with the HOA <br /> Board to discuss the need to increase the district assessments to meet the maintenance <br /> requirements. The HOA Board was not overly supportive of increasing the assessment <br /> amount. Nevertheless, the question must be put forward all district property owners as <br /> an increase in the annual assessment is necessary in order to continue the <br /> maintenance standards of the district, and replenish the reserve needed to fund <br /> eventual capital repair and replacement costs. Prior to the vote, staff will invite all district <br /> property owners to public meetings to clearly present the need for the increase. This <br /> information will also be given in writing to each property owner in the district along with <br /> their voting ballot. The information presented will also include that if the vote is 'no', all <br /> property owners must expect very minimal landscape maintenance. <br /> Landscape Maintenance District 1993-2 (Bonde Ranch) <br /> The Bonde Ranch subdivision (District 1993-2) has 103 parcels; the district has been in <br /> place for 26 years. Maintenance in this district includes entry features, open space <br /> areas, firebreaks, trees, shrubbery, groundcover and irrigation systems for the Bonde <br /> Ranch subdivision (Tracts 6483 and 6518). <br /> The current assessment is inadequate to fund the maintenance of the district, including <br /> water costs, county assessment fees, city administration fees, and capital repair or <br /> replacement costs. Since there is no funding for capital repair or replacements, City <br /> Staff was forced to shut off the irrigation system due to leaks and other problems with <br /> the system. An increase in the annual assessment will be necessary in order to <br /> continue to maintain the health of the landscape, repair and update the irrigation <br /> system, and replenish the dedicated funding source needed to fund eventual capital <br /> repair and replacement costs. <br /> Bonde Ranch does not have a HOA, so the opportunity to speak with a group of <br /> property owners regarding the need to increase the assessments has not yet occurred. <br /> However, the process to inform the district members regarding the issue, leading to a <br /> Proposition 218-compliant vote, will be much the same as it was for Windsor. <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.