Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 7 <br /> P14-0852 and PUD-105, 7106-7315 Johnson Drive and 7035-7080 Commerce Circle <br /> Consider: (1) certifying the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR); <br /> (2) approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of the project <br /> site from Business Park (Industrial/Commercial and Office) and General and Limited Industrial <br /> to Retail/Highway/ Service Commercial; Business and Professional Offices; and (3) approval of <br /> a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezoning to rezone the project site from Planned Unit <br /> Development-General and Light Industrial (PUD-G&LI) District, Planned Unit Development <br /> Industrial/Commercial-Office (PUD I/C 0) District, and General Industrial (I-G-40,000) District <br /> to PUD-C District on 12 parcels at 7106 through 7315 Johnson Drive and 7035 and 7080 <br /> Commerce Circle, comprising approximately 40 acres known as the Johnson Drive Economic <br /> Development Zone (JDEDZ). <br /> Community Development Director Ellen Clark recused from the Public Hearing for Item 5. <br /> Interim Planning Manager/Permit Center Manager Melinda Denis sat in for the Public Hearing <br /> for Item 5. <br /> Associate Planner Eric Luchini presented the specifics of the item in the Agenda Report. <br /> Chair Allen asked whether the Planning Commission's goal is to make a recommendation <br /> based upon what was previously approved or if additional areas within the Environmental <br /> Impact Report (EIR) were open for potential discussion. <br /> Mr. Luchini responded this is a de novo decision and the Planning Commission has the ability <br /> to review everything within the record to date. <br /> Assistant City Manager Brian Dolan cautioned the Commission to do so, stating the issues and <br /> impacts were well-analyzed and discussed when the project previously came before the <br /> Commission. <br /> Chair Allen referred to the EIR and said one section has been revised while the other sections <br /> remained the same. She said she thought adjustments might need to be made since it's been <br /> two years since the project came before the Commission and assumptions had been made at <br /> that time. She asked if there was any standard when sections of the document might need to <br /> be reviewed and amended. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated staff's analysis is adequate and he deferred to the EIR consultant, Rick <br /> Jarvis. <br /> ESA consultant Rick Jarvis spoke to the previous analysis conducted, the current analysis <br /> conducted and the previous EIR, all of which are believed to be sufficient. <br /> Commissioner Pace inquired about the impact to the existing retail within the City and the <br /> suggestion that retailers might be benefited by what is proposed to occupy the space. <br /> Mr. Luchini responded that the Economic Impact Analysis had drawn the conclusion that <br /> because Costco sources many products there is a small chance they would benefit existing <br /> retailers in town because they could source products locally to them. Additionally, due to the <br /> anticipated growth within the City over the next 10 years and the demand that will accompany <br /> Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, December 11, 2019 Page 1 of 6 <br />