|
Bringhurst LLC at 990 Sycamore Road
<br /> Initial Study and Negative Declaration
<br /> 6. REFERENCES
<br /> ' Biological Resources Analysis Report by Olberding Environmental, Inc., dated May 2019
<br /> 2 Arborist Report by HortScience, dated March 2018
<br /> 3 Geotechnical Studies prepared by PRA Group dated October 2007 and updated in
<br /> August 2018.
<br /> 4 Engeo Inc. Peer Review Reports of Geotechnical Studies Prepared by PRA Group dated
<br /> November 2018.
<br /> S Climate Action Plan, City of Pleasanton, 2012
<br /> 6 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality
<br /> Guidelines, updated May 2017
<br /> 7 Hydrology Studies by LandTech, January 3, 2000, and revisions responding to Engeo peer
<br /> revew comments, dated January 25, 2019
<br /> 8 Engeo Inc. Peer Review of Hydrology Studies by LandTech, dated November 18, 2018.
<br /> 9 City of Pleasanton. Pleasanton General Plan 2005-2025, Land Use Element.
<br /> '° City of Pleasanton, Pleasanton General Plan 2005-2025, Public Facilities and Community
<br /> Programs Element
<br /> 49
<br />onsiderable
<br /> when viewed in connection with the effects of past
<br /> projects,the effects of other current projects, and the
<br /> effects of probable future projects)?
<br /> c) Does the project have environmental effects, which X
<br /> will cause substantial adverse effects on human
<br /> beings, either directly or indirectly?
<br /> DISCUSSION
<br /> a) The project is located on a site containing a segment of Sycamore Creek and
<br /> a single-family residence. The Biological Resources Analysis Report by
<br /> Olberding Environmental, Inc. found no significant habitat or fish, wildlife, or
<br /> plant species existing on the subject site. There are no rare, endangered, or
<br /> threatened species known to inhabit the subject property, nor are there
<br /> historic resources. Therefore, the project would have a less-than-significant
<br /> impact on biological and cultural resources.
<br /> b) Constructing this project would incrementally increase impacts related to
<br /> certain environmental factors as detailed in the preceding sections. However,
<br /> given that the site is an infill location, surrounded by residential development,
<br /> the increases would not be cumulatively considerable. Therefore, this
<br /> potential impact would be less than significant.
<br /> 47
<br /> 45
<br />ally or cumulatively, a level of service standard
<br /> established by the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency for
<br /> designated roads or highways. As a result, a CMP traffic analysis is not
<br /> required. Therefore, the project impact would be less than significant.
<br /> 43
<br /> 36
<br />tudies found that the proposed development would result in slight increase
<br /> in surface water flow into Sycamore Creek, but the increase is not considered
<br /> to be significant and would not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or
<br /> 31
<br />event landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence,
<br /> liquefaction and collapse on the project site. The State of California provides
<br /> 24
<br />ical significance specifically
<br /> designated by official action; 5.A stand of trees, the nature of which makes each dependent upon
<br /> the other for survival or the area's natural beauty.
<br /> 20
<br />ive by having the additional two parcels.
<br /> Excerpt Planning Commission Minutes, July 11, 2018 Page 9 of 11
<br />, 2018 Page 3 of 11
<br />Way, existing lots range from 15,033 sq. ft. (5769 Hanifen Way)to 20,313 sq.
<br /> ft. (1008 Sycamore Creek Way).
<br /> P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission
<br /> 11of16
<br /> 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36.
<br /> ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k
<br /> 3S 94 '@ g 'via
<br /> R T3
<br /> 1:5,300
<br /> 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _
<br /> January 7 2020 `( �� ""���
<br /> 0 330 660 Feet I Y
<br /> I , I I
<br />
|