3_Exhibits A & C-G - Laserfiche WebLink

Bringhurst LLC at 990 Sycamore Road Initial Study and Negative Declaration b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning X of,forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g), timberland (as defined in Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest X land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, X which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? DISCUSSION a, c-e) The site is not designated as Prime Farmland per the State Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency. Although designed with a PUD-A land use by NSSP, the site is occupied by an existing single-family residence and no productive agricultural or forestry land is located on the site. The proposed development would not result in the conversion of any Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance into non- agricultural use or forest to non-forest uses. Therefore, the project would result in no impact with respect to agricultural and forestry resources. b) The project site is in an urban setting. The existing approximately 3.28-acre site is occupied by a single-family residence. The current PUD-A zoning allows keeping of limited quantities of farm animals and the residents have two goats on site. The application proposes to change a northern portion of the site from the existing PUD-A to PUD-MDR so that the uses in the northern portion of the site would be more compatible to surrounding residential uses. The southern portion of the site would remain as PUD-A, which would continue allow agricultural uses, such as livestock and poultry raising for private, noncommercial use, orchards, etc. Additionally, there is no Williamson Act contract for the project site. Therefore, this would be less than significant impact. 5.3. AIR QUALITY ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The project site is located within Pleasanton and Alameda County, and within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (Air Basin). Air quality in the Air Basin is regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the California Air Resources Board 14 4 at would be amenities, because a design for connection of a trail would be ready in the near term, she recommended funding be provided by the applicant to the City to be used for the highest priority projects in the bike and pedestrian master plan that deal with connectivity, especially in south Pleasanton. One in particular is the circuit bicyclists take from Sycamore to Foothill and then around Foothill. One of the key provisions is for a wider bike lane on Foothill so there is a logical connection to improving bicycling along the corridor here that is realistic in the near term and money can do that. She asked that staff look at other options along those lines, and how much of a contribution was realistic based on splitting the difference of the profit a land owner would receive by having the additional two parcels. Excerpt Planning Commission Minutes, July 11, 2018 Page 9 of 11 , 2018 Page 3 of 11 Way, existing lots range from 15,033 sq. ft. (5769 Hanifen Way)to 20,313 sq. ft. (1008 Sycamore Creek Way). P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission 11of16 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36. ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k 3S 94 '@ g 'via R T3 1:5,300 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _ January 7 2020 `( �� ""�� 0 330 660 Feet I Y I , I I