|
PUD-53: Bringhurst Property Five-Lot Development Plan
<br /> In March 2006, the Bringhurst family submitted an application similar to that currently before
<br /> the Planning Commission, to amend the NSSP for a five-lot PUD development plan (PUD-53).
<br /> The prior proposal was largely similar to the current proposal, including three lots fronting
<br /> Sycamore Creek Way, and two lots on Sycamore Road. Also included in the proposal was a
<br /> request to realign the multi-use trail identified in the NSSP, which was brought to the Trails Ad
<br /> Hoc Subcommittee and Parks and Recreation Commission for consideration in 2006. The
<br /> Planning Commission considered and provided input on the proposed PUD plan at a 2008
<br /> work session.
<br /> Trail Realignment— Review by Trails Subcommittee and Parks and Recreation Commission
<br /> PUD-53 included a proposed realignment that was consistent with that conceptually approved
<br /> as part of PUD 97-21 (see above), intended to avoid having the public trail run along the back
<br /> of the proposed new private lots. Instead, the trail would follow Dale Way to Sycamore
<br /> Road/Minnie Street, where it would turn and head east along Sycamore Road/Minnie Street to
<br /> eventually connect to the Happy Valley Loop Trail along Alisal Street (see Figure 5). In
<br /> September 2006, the City's Trails Ad Hoc Committee considered the proposed trail
<br /> realignment. The Committee supported the proposed realignment, with the outcome of the
<br /> Committee's discussion then reported to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The
<br /> Commission did not take a formal vote on the proposal, but no significant questions or
<br /> objections were raised.
<br /> Figure 5: NSSP Approved and Proposed Multi-Use Trail Alignments
<br /> V 12 1 , V .l f' `j 2t•`_`-i/ ' ! ' :i ;. ' i a ' `
<br /> r �„. at oo —'� `.. �,Q'\IIIIIIII : .�..s l ;: �; i r; 2 1 i
<br /> �� 11!!' I I „ a - / /4.; j
<br /> .;....2.74/
<br /> " ty '' ` :Alp, «`r ' `moi. , �o` I ri It ''►'�+'
<br /> 0 - - �..:i1911 liti •. • r �,:'/��;,'.1___.... - C
<br /> �` ';�. NSSP Approved Multi- , II' ,._,_ '' is ," '"'t
<br /> ,�� i, .fili a1* I . a
<br /> 7 f�
<br /> [—I
<br /> r Use Trail Alignment '�•. .. .. r -- •
<br /> ArN\
<br /> •
<br /> , --`4 / l IP...„, ''''.. , ._,, 24 . ,p, w
<br /> L.- _(.. -,...,� / l iQ <7/t.3 -o o,..,, , f -----.......,
<br /> it ' _
<br /> ,_, „ ......t.J 1---___j
<br /> + 7 4.....,..„ J 1
<br /> _1, ` 7 �' ./ Proposed Trail �.1 i
<br /> ��`' ={ t , 1T`,� Alignment `4
<br /> an LIMY _ [�._—V--.
<br /> dopes generally "---- --- ,` _ __
<br /> ."... ....,
<br /> bove 10 percent. . a .i ,' / �` / `
<br /> Arir '1l ,.
<br /> PUD-53 - March 2008 Planning Commission Work Session
<br /> In March 2008 the Planning Commission held a work session on the proposed PUD. (See
<br /> Exhibit C for the July 11, 2018, Planning Commission Work Session Agenda Report.)
<br /> The Planning Commission questioned and was concerned about the City's prior decision to
<br /> allow site grading and stubbing of utilities prior to receiving project approvals, and that more
<br /> utility laterals had been allowed than the number of residential lots/homes permitted by the
<br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission
<br /> 990 Sycamore Road
<br /> 7 of 23
<br /> A'17 3. `.r� C� .
<br /> P / 34. a a 9 ,e // l'`* ,7^" �, 3 a �r -)
<br /> NILW� 1� Ply (7) ,3 •" r �� t ', "
<br /> r
<br /> 4,, ./;:'!7*.
<br /> .'/ i 5 tui' "Pi,,, ryp ( ot, S'L,, i .g,, 1i, I .+� s1.
<br /> i� 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36.
<br /> ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k
<br /> 3S 94 '@ g 'via
<br /> R T3
<br /> 1:5,300
<br /> 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _
<br /> January 7 2020 `( �� ""���
<br /> 0 330 660 Feet I Y
<br /> I , I I
<br />
|