My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
01-22
>
3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2020 1:15:19 PM
Creation date
1/16/2020 12:02:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/22/2020
Document Relationships
3_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\01-22
3_Exhibits A & C-G
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\01-22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
to support, rather than deny the application, this requirement would be included as a condition <br /> of approval. <br /> Stormwater and Drainage <br /> The project would collect and convey all stormwater originating from the development to the <br /> City's storm drain systems. The lots fronting Sycamore Creek Way would be connected to the <br /> City's storm drain system in Sycamore Creek Way and the lots fronting Sycamore Road would <br /> be connected to the City's storm drain system in Sycamore Road. Although the project would <br /> not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern, it would increase the amount of impervious <br /> area on the site. The applicant proposes a stormwater bioretention area on each lot to <br /> manage, slow down, and treat stormwater runoff before it enters the City's storm drain system. <br /> As a result, the proposed development would not substantially increase the rate or amount of <br /> surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site. <br /> Sycamore Creek <br /> Sycamore Creek bisects the existing parcel in an east-west direction. The NSSP requires all <br /> new development adjacent to the creek to be set back from the toe of the slope by a minimum <br /> suitable distance as recommended by a geotechnical engineer and/or certified engineering <br /> geologist. The proposed plan shows the project geotechnical engineer's recommended <br /> 30-foot setback from the toe of the slope on either side of the creek and complies with this <br /> NSSP requirement. The setback was peer reviewed by the City's geotechnical engineering <br /> who concurred that it was acceptable. <br /> The proposed Lot 5 contains the segment of the creek; thus, the owner(s) of Lot 5 should be <br /> responsible for maintenance of the creek. Additionally, the Engineering Department has <br /> identified the need for a 60-foot wide public access easement and storm drain easement <br /> centered on the creek centerline, matching the existing 60-foot wide easement in the Bridle <br /> Creek development to the west. This easement is for storm drain purposes with the right to <br /> construct and maintain said easement if the property owner of Lot 5 fails to maintain it to the <br /> satisfaction of the City Engineer. When such situation occurs, the City will perform the <br /> maintenance at the cost of the property owner of Lot 5. Should the Planning Commission opt <br /> to support, rather than deny the application, a condition of approval would address this item. <br /> In order to determine whether the proposed project would affect the water flow in Sycamore <br /> Creek, hydrology studies were prepared by LandTech, Inc. The studies found that the <br /> proposed development would result in a slight increase in surface water flow into Sycamore <br /> Creek, but the increase is not considered to be significant and would not result in substantial <br /> erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The hydrology studies were peer reviewed by Engeo, Inc., <br /> acting as the City's geotechnical peer review consultant. Engeo concurred with the analysis <br /> and conclusions in the hydrology studies. The hydrology studies and peer review reports are <br /> included with Exhibit B. <br /> Biological and Tree Assessments <br /> There are a number of mature trees on the property site including native valley oak, sycamore, <br /> and California black walnut trees; these are generally located in the southern portion of the site <br /> and adjacent to the creek. Non-native trees including eucalyptus, acacia and other non-native <br /> species, are also located on site, and a variety of shrubs, grasses, and groundcover surround <br /> the existing home. All existing trees are proposed to be retained. <br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> 20 of 23 <br /> �r -) <br /> NILW� 1� Ply (7) ,3 •" r �� t ', " <br /> r <br /> 4,, ./;:'!7*. <br /> .'/ i 5 tui' "Pi,,, ryp ( ot, S'L,, i .g,, 1i, I .+� s1. <br /> i� 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36. <br /> ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k <br /> 3S 94 '@ g 'via <br /> R T3 <br /> 1:5,300 <br /> 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _ <br /> January 7 2020 `( �� ""��� <br /> 0 330 660 Feet I Y <br /> I , I I <br />