|
EXHIBITS: A. Draft Resolutions
<br /> B. Project Narrative, Proposed PUD Development Plan, Design
<br /> Guidelines, Vesting Tentative Map, and Associated Studies
<br /> and Reports
<br /> C July 11, 2018, Planning Commission Work Session Agenda
<br /> Report and Minutes (excerpt)
<br /> D. April 22, 2019 Bicycle, Pedestrian, Trails Committee Meeting
<br /> Minutes and May 9, 2019 Parks and Recreation Commission
<br /> meeting minutes (except)
<br /> E. Draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration
<br /> F. Public Comments
<br /> G. Location and Notification Map
<br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATION
<br /> Based in the analysis stated in the agenda report, staff is recommending that the Planning
<br /> Commission deny the proposed 5-lot residential development and the amendments to the
<br /> North Sycamore Specific Plan (NSSP) to increase number of residential units by taking the
<br /> following actions:
<br /> 1. Make the finding that not all PUD considerations for the proposed PUD development
<br /> plan can be made as discussed in the agenda report;
<br /> 2. Adopt a resolution recommending denial of project as proposed, and forward the
<br /> application to the City Council for public hearing and review.
<br /> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
<br /> Alaina Stewart, on behalf of the family trust, Bringhurst LLC, is proposing a 5-lot
<br /> single-family residential subdivision on the existing approximately 3.28-acre site at
<br /> 990 Sycamore Road, which is two more lots than currently allowed by the North Sycamore
<br /> Specific Plan (NSSP) and requires approval of a Specific Plan Amendment. NSSP
<br /> amendments are also required to allow three of the lots to have vehicular access from
<br /> Sycamore Creek Way, to allow one of the PUD-A lots to be less than one acre in area, and to
<br /> realign the planned public trail on the site.
<br /> The project was previously reviewed by the Planning Commission as a work session item on
<br /> July 11, 2018. The Planning Commission stated it could generally support three homes
<br /> fronting Sycamore Creek Way if they were designed to be comparable to the design, setbacks,
<br /> building mass and bulk, and floor area of the adjacent Sycamore Heights homes on Sycamore
<br /> Creek Way. The Commission was concerned with the proposed additional lot and future home
<br /> on Sycamore Road and its compatibility with the existing neighborhood. The Planning
<br /> Commission suggested the future home on this lot, if allowable, should be less visible and
<br /> maintain the rural character of the area.
<br /> While the project is proposed to follow the design pattern along Sycamore Creek Way,
<br /> amending the Specific Plan is a significant request and would allow for an increase in density
<br /> and unit count beyond that envisioned for the site in the NSSP. Staff does not support the
<br /> specific plan amendment to allow for the density increase; thus, recommends the Planning
<br /> Commission recommend the City Council deny the applications.
<br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission
<br /> 990 Sycamore Road
<br /> 2 of 23
<br /> 4' n M135 14
<br /> .� 4 ~m ve' 4 it�`` �f � " , 3zv� 3224 a2 ,x
<br /> .a M u t `� ,�"� �� 4 $ 'i 1.. 4" �� ,�;3 'tom 9 ,CL+,G �3,`�
<br /> v
<br /> i ,,....:: ,
<br /> - 4375
<br /> , J ' :�. ,39, �a,. // ..vim rrz fid ^ r� ¢ z,�o ri" t
<br /> ,,,„ Acb..'M°} �4 346? kze ' ,yL7 �J.9 5 n .! A'17 3. `.r� C� .
<br /> P / 34. a a 9 ,e // l'`* ,7^" �, 3 a �r -)
<br /> NILW� 1� Ply (7) ,3 •" r �� t ', "
<br /> r
<br /> 4,, ./;:'!7*.
<br /> .'/ i 5 tui' "Pi,,, ryp ( ot, S'L,, i .g,, 1i, I .+� s1.
<br /> i� 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36.
<br /> ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k
<br /> 3S 94 '@ g 'via
<br /> R T3
<br /> 1:5,300
<br /> 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _
<br /> January 7 2020 `( �� ""���
<br /> 0 330 660 Feet I Y
<br /> I , I I
<br />
|