My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
01-22
>
3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2020 1:15:19 PM
Creation date
1/16/2020 12:02:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/22/2020
Document Relationships
3_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\01-22
3_Exhibits A & C-G
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\01-22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and construction of a new home on Lot 5). The design guidelines for the homes on the PUD- <br /> MDR lots include these key design criteria: <br /> 1. The homes have compatible and comparable designs, details, and color/material <br /> themes as the existing homes in the Sycamore Heights development. Structures should <br /> be designed to harmonize with the natural setting and with neighboring homes. <br /> 2. All structures shall reflect a high standard of architectural design. <br /> 3. Design should consider the privacy of neighbors when locating doors, windows, <br /> balconies and patios. <br /> 4. The visual prominence of garage doors should be minimized. <br /> The design guidelines for the homes on the PUD-A lots include these key design criteria: <br /> 1. Architectural styles suitable to the existing semi-rural character are encouraged. The <br /> generally informal character of the neighborhood's structures should be reinforced. <br /> Informal architectural styles reflective of California's heritage such as ranch-style homes <br /> are strongly encouraged while more formal styles reflecting Neo-Colonial, European <br /> Estate, or similar architecture should not be used. <br /> 2. Stone and treated woods are strongly encouraged for exterior surfaces. Stucco may be <br /> used, provided that it is complementary to the home design and it is a muted earth tone <br /> color. Limestone, coolstone and similar materials are prohibited. <br /> 3. If a two-story home is proposed, the second floor shall not exceed 40% of the first-floor <br /> area and the second floor shall either have walls that are set back from the first-floor <br /> walls or the second floor shall be integrated into the roof of the house with dormers <br /> used for windows or to provide adequate head clearance. <br /> 4. The visual prominence of garage doors should be minimized. New construction should <br /> seek to limit the amount of garage fronts visible from adjacent roads. <br /> Staff and the applicant worked collaboratively on the design guidelines together with the <br /> guidelines as proposed acceptable to both parties. For additional design criteria, please refer <br /> to the design guidelines attached as Exhibit B. <br /> All new homes would require subsequent design review process in accordance with Section <br /> 18.20 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code. Design review applications will be processed at staff <br /> level unless it is forwarded to the Planning Commission at the discretion of the zoning <br /> administrator. <br /> Visual Analysis <br /> At the July 2018 work session, the Planning Commission requested a streetscape visual be <br /> provided when the application returns to the Commission to demonstrate how a future home <br /> on the proposed Lot 1 would fit into the neighborhood. The Planning Commission indicated the <br /> streetscape visual would help in understanding the mass and bulk of the future home, and <br /> structure's appropriate setbacks in respect to Sycamore Road and Sycamore Creek. <br /> No streetscape visual was submitted as part of the application submittal. The applicant <br /> decided not to provide this item, citing cost as the factor. <br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> 18 of 23 <br /> in size. The Planning Commission concurred with staff's position. <br /> Staff notes, the segment of Sycamore Creek on the project site is approximately 6,008 square <br /> feet (creek bank to creek bank) in area. Even if the entire segment of the creek were placed on <br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> 16 of 23 <br /> P / 34. a a 9 ,e // l'`* ,7^" �, 3 a �r -) <br /> NILW� 1� Ply (7) ,3 •" r �� t ', " <br /> r <br /> 4,, ./;:'!7*. <br /> .'/ i 5 tui' "Pi,,, ryp ( ot, S'L,, i .g,, 1i, I .+� s1. <br /> i� 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36. <br /> ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k <br /> 3S 94 '@ g 'via <br /> R T3 <br /> 1:5,300 <br /> 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _ <br /> January 7 2020 `( �� ""��� <br /> 0 330 660 Feet I Y <br /> I , I I <br />