My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
012120
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2020 5:38:54 PM
Creation date
1/15/2020 5:38:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/21/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> 2019 Bill Content and Revisions <br /> Senate Bill 50 was introduced by Senator Wiener in December, 2018, as part of the <br /> 2019 legislative session. Broadly described, SB50 seeks to reduce barriers to local <br /> approval of housing projects, by establishing incentives for housing projects, including <br /> substantially relaxed height limits, development densities, and parking standards for <br /> projects proximate to transit and jobs centers. <br /> The earliest versions of the bill required local jurisdictions to allow minimum height limits <br /> of 45 and 55 feet, substantial relaxation of Floor Area Ratio (FAR) limits, elimination of <br /> density caps, and minimal parking for eligible housing projects within proximity to jobs <br /> and transit stops. The legislation took a "one-size-fits-all" approach, with no distinction <br /> made among different types or sizes of communities. Communities throughout the state <br /> expressed significant opposition to the bill, based on concerns about loss of local <br /> control, lack of sensitivity to existing neighborhoods, and impacts on smaller and rural <br /> communities. Affordable housing and tenants' rights advocates expressed concern <br /> about the lack of protections to avoid displacement and equity impacts on sensitive <br /> communities. <br /> Based on these concerns, and in an effort to address the concerns of smaller <br /> communities, the bill was amended in May 2019 to create a two-tiered approach for <br /> counties with populations either greater, or less than, 600,000 people. Since Alameda <br /> County's population exceeds 600,000, the change did not have a significant effect on <br /> the potential impact of the legislation in Pleasanton, continuing to allow heights of 45 to <br /> 55 feet, increased FAR, and minimal parking for qualifying residential projects. <br /> Although some provisions were included to protect historic resources, those definitions <br /> were drawn quite narrowly to include only properties on the State or federal register of <br /> historic resources: when applied locally they would protect very few of the City's historic <br /> resources. They include the Kottinger Barn and Heathcote Mackenzie House (within the <br /> Alameda County Fairgrounds), both of which are listed on the National Register; the <br /> Alviso Adobe is a State Historic Landmark, and the Mohr-English House' is listed as a <br /> State "point of interest." <br /> In response to the draft legislation, both the Tri-Valley Cities, and the City of Pleasanton <br /> took an "oppose unless amended" position, citing significant concerns about the <br /> proposed legislation, including several of the issues noted above. In June, 2019, facing <br /> ongoing opposition from numerous local jurisdictions and other stakeholders, SB50 was <br /> tabled to become a two-year bill, with the expectation that additional revisions would be <br /> made to address concerns and build broader support for the legislation in 2020. <br /> The location of the Mohr-English House is not clear in the State records. It was noted in the 1986 General Plan as <br /> being located at the"north end of Martin Avenue." <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.