My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-99-80
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC-99-80
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:32:57 AM
Creation date
3/23/2004 9:37:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/27/1999
DOCUMENT NO
PC-99-80
DOCUMENT NAME
SP-99-02
NOTES
SF WATER DEP
NOTES 3
APPROVAL OF SP PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Facts in SUDDort ofFindiDlz: The following facts demonstrate that it is Dot feasible to <br />mitigate the impact to a less than significant level. <br /> <br />a. Master PUD Condition 64 requires that the Project comply with the City of <br />Pleasanton's Transportation Systems Management (TSM) program. The September 1998 <br />Specific Plan (Air Quality Policy 1) encourages "natural gas fireplaces, fireplace inserts, <br />and certified wood stoves to reduce fireplace emissions. Wood-burning fireplaces shall be <br />limited to 1 per dwelling unit." Thus, feasible mitigation measures have been incorporated <br />into the Project. <br /> <br />b. The September 1998 Specific Plan (Land Use Element) encourages the <br />siting of commercial! office uses proximate to regional transportation systems, as well as to <br />neighborhood and community residents, in order to provide employment opportunities <br />that can reduce regional and local traffic impacts. The circulation pattern and street <br />design emphasize the pedestrian by providing an inter-connected pattern of streets, trails, <br />and walkways that provide for a variety of alternative modes of travel. <br /> <br />c. Given the level of development and associated traffic generation under <br />each alternative, except the No Project Alternative, the contribution to regional emissions <br />would be similar to the project. The No Project Alternative is rejected because it would <br />not meet any of the Project Sponsor's objectives nor would it fulfill any of the City's <br />objectives for this site, including provision of additional housing, open space and public <br />improvements. <br /> <br />d. Pleasanton adopted a finding of overriding consideration in approving its <br />1996 General Plan for air quality impacts. The Project is consistent with the growth <br />contemplated at that time. <br /> <br />D. NOISE <br /> <br />1. ImDact LIa(1). Proposed residential development on the West Parcel north of the <br />1-680 overcrossing of the Pleasanton Avenue extension would be exposed to a Ldn of <br />greater than 60 dB. <br /> <br />MitilZation Measures: <br />Measure Lla(l). Increase the height or shift the location of the proposed bennlsoundwall <br />combinations. <br /> <br />Measure Llc(3). Require detailed project-specific noise studies for each development <br />project in an area where the standard is exceeded to characterize noise conditions and to <br />identify the noise reduction features that must be incorporated to achieve acceptable <br />interior noise levels, and require incorporation of those features into construction. <br /> <br />FindinlZ: Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation <br />measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. <br /> <br />SF:FMP\A.GR\WEX\61131664.2 <br />062499 <br /> <br />A-57 <br /> <br />WJ!X-660B3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.