Laserfiche WebLink
<br />b. None of the alternatives considered in the EIR, except the No Project <br />Alternative, would avoid or substantially lessen this impact. The commercial and <br />residential development levels proposed under each alternative would generate traffic <br />levels that would result in the same impact. The No Project Alternative is rejected <br />because it would not meet any of the Project Sponsor's objectives nor would it fulfill any <br />of the City's objectives for this site, including provision of additional housing, open space <br />and public improvements. <br /> <br />c. Pleasanton adopted a finding of overriding considerations in approving its <br />1996 General Plan for impacts growth would have on regional transportation systems. <br />This project is consistent with the planned growth contemplated at that time. <br /> <br />2. Imnact J1 O. Project traffic would contribute to cumulative traffic growth on the <br />regional transportation system. <br /> <br />MitilZation Measure: <br />Measure J1 O. Require the project sponsor to make a fair share contribution to regional <br />transportation improvements by paying impact fees, when such fees are adopted by the <br />Tri-Valley Council. <br /> <br />FindinlZ: Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible project <br />alternatives identified in the Final EIR which would reduce this impact to a less than <br />significant level. <br /> <br />Facts in Sunnort ofFindinlZ: The following facts demonstrate that it is not feasible to <br />mitigate the impact to a less than significant level. <br /> <br />a This impact is the same as Impact J3 and the findings thereunder are <br />incorporated by reference. Feasible Mitigation Measure JlO has been incorporated into <br />the Project. <br /> <br />b. None of the alternatives considered in the EIR, except the No Project <br />Alternative, would avoid or substantially lessen this impact. The No Project Alternative is <br />rejected because it would not meet any of the Project Sponsor's objectives nor would it <br />fulfill any of the City's objectives for this site, including provision of additional housing, <br />open space and public improvements. <br /> <br />c. Pleasanton adopted a finding of overriding considerations in approving its <br />1996 General Plan for impacts growth would have on regional transportation systems. <br />This project is consistent with the planned growth contemplated at that time. <br /> <br />SF:FMPlAGR\WEX\61131664.2 <br />062499 <br /> <br />A-55 <br /> <br />WEX-660B3 <br />